Dynasties in Chinese history, or Chinese dynasties, were hereditary monarchical regimes that ruled over China during much of its history. From the inauguration of dynastic rule by Yu the Great in circa 2070 BC to the abdication of the Xuantong Emperor on 12 February 1912 in the wake of the Xinhai Revolution, China was ruled by a series of successive dynasties.[a][b] Dynasties of China were not limited to those established by ethnic Han—the dominant Chinese ethnic group—and its predecessor, the Huaxia tribal confederation, but also included those founded by non-Han peoples.
Dividing Chinese history into periods ruled by dynasties is a common method of periodization utilized by scholars. Accordingly, a dynasty may be used to delimit the era during which a family reigned, as well as to describe events, trends, personalities, artistic compositions, and artifacts of that period. For example, porcelain made during the Ming dynasty may be referred to as "Ming porcelain". The word "dynasty" is usually omitted when making such adjectival references.
The longest-reigning orthodox dynasty of China was the Zhou dynasty, ruling for a total length of 789 years, albeit it is divided into the Western Zhou and the Eastern Zhou in Chinese historiography, and its power was drastically reduced during the latter part of its rule. The largest orthodox Chinese dynasty in terms of territorial size was either the Yuan dynasty or the Qing dynasty, depending on the historical source.[c]
Chinese dynasties often referred to themselves as "Tiāncháo" (天朝; "Celestial Dynasty" or "Heavenly Dynasty"). As a form of respect and subordination, Chinese tributary states referred to Chinese dynasties as "Tiāncháo Shàngguó" (天朝上國; "Celestial Dynasty of the Lofty State") or "Tiāncháo Dàguó" (天朝大國; "Celestial Dynasty of the Great State").
In the Chinese language, the character "cháo" (朝) originally meant "morning" and "today". Politically, the word is taken to refer to the regime of the incumbent ruler.
The following is a list of terms associated with the concept of dynasty in Chinese historiography:
- cháo (朝): a dynasty
- cháodài (朝代): an era corresponding to the rule of a dynasty
- wángcháo (王朝): while technically referring to royal dynasties, this term is often inaccurately applied to all dynasties, including those whose rulers held non-royal titles such as emperor
- huángcháo (皇朝): generally used for imperial dynasties
Start of dynastic rule
As the founder of China's debated first dynasty, the Xia dynasty, Yu the Great is conventionally regarded as the inaugurator of dynastic rule in China.[a] In the Chinese dynastic system, sovereign rulers theoretically possessed absolute power and private ownership of the realm, even though in practice their actual power was dependent on numerous factors.[d] By tradition, the Chinese throne was inherited exclusively by members of the male line, but there were numerous cases whereby the consort kins came to possess de facto power at the expense of the monarchs.[e] This concept, known as jiā tiānxià (家天下; "All under Heaven belongs to the ruling family"), was in contrast to the pre-Xia notion of gōng tiānxià (公天下; "All under Heaven belongs to the public") whereby leadership succession was non-hereditary.
An illustration of the Battle of Shanhai Pass
, a decisive battle fought during the Ming–Qing transition. The victorious Qing dynasty
extended its rule into China proper thereafter.
The rise and fall of dynasties is a prominent feature of Chinese history. Some scholars have attempted to explain this phenomenon by attributing the success and failure of dynasties to the morality of the rulers, while others have focused on the tangible aspects of monarchical rule. This method of explanation has come to be known as the dynastic cycle.
Dynastic transitions (改朝換代; gǎi cháo huàn dài) in the history of China occurred primarily through two ways: military conquest and usurpation. The supersession of the Liao dynasty by the Jin dynasty was achieved following a series of successful military campaigns, as was the later unification of China under the Yuan dynasty; on the other hand, the transition from the Eastern Han to the Cao Wei, as well as from the Southern Qi to the Liang dynasty, were cases of usurpation. Oftentimes, usurpers would seek to portray their predecessors as having relinquished the throne willingly—a process called shànràng (禪讓; "voluntary abdication")—as a means to legitimize their rule.
One might incorrectly infer from viewing historical timelines that transitions between dynasties occurred abruptly and roughly. Rather, new dynasties were often established before the complete overthrow of an existing regime. For example, AD 1644 is frequently cited as the year in which the Qing dynasty succeeded the Ming dynasty in possessing the Mandate of Heaven. However, the Qing dynasty was officially proclaimed in AD 1636 by the Emperor Taizong of Qing through renaming the Later Jin established by his father the Emperor Taizu of Qing in AD 1616, while the Ming imperial family would rule the Southern Ming until AD 1662. The Ming loyalist Kingdom of Tungning based in Taiwan continued to oppose the Qing until AD 1683. Meanwhile, other factions also fought for control over China during the Ming–Qing transition, most notably the Shun and the Xi dynasties proclaimed by Li Zicheng and Zhang Xianzhong respectively. This change of ruling houses was a convoluted and prolonged affair, and the Qing took almost two decades to extend their rule over the entirety of China proper.
Similarly, during the earlier Sui–Tang transition, numerous regimes established by rebel forces vied for control and legitimacy as the power of the ruling Sui dynasty weakened. Autonomous regimes that existed during this period of upheaval included, but not limited to, Wei (魏; by Li Mi), Qin (秦; by Xue Ju), Qi (齊; by Gao Tancheng), Xu (許; by Yuwen Huaji), Liang (梁; by Shen Faxing), Liang (梁; by Liang Shidu), Xia (夏; by Dou Jiande), Zheng (鄭; by Wang Shichong), Chu (楚; by Zhu Can), Chu (楚; by Lin Shihong), Yan (燕; by Gao Kaidao), and Song (宋; by Fu Gongshi). The Tang dynasty that superseded the Sui launched a decade-long military campaign to reunify China proper.
Frequently, remnants and descendants of previous dynasties were either purged or granted noble titles in accordance with the Èr Wáng Sān Kè (二王三恪; "two crownings, three respects") system. The latter served as a means for the reigning dynasty to claim legitimate succession from earlier dynasties. For example, the Emperor Xiaojing of Eastern Wei was accorded the title "Prince of Zhongshan" by the Emperor Wenxuan of Northern Qi following the latter's deposition of the former. Similarly, Chai Yong, a nephew of the Emperor Shizong of Later Zhou, was conferred the title "Duke of Chongyi" by the Emperor Renzong of Song; other descendants of the Later Zhou ruling family came to inherit the noble title thereafter.
According to Chinese historiographical tradition, each new dynasty would compose the history of the preceding dynasty, culminating in the Twenty-Four Histories. This tradition was maintained even after the Xinhai Revolution overthrew the Qing dynasty in favor of the Republic of China. However, the attempt by the Republicans to draft the history of the Qing was disrupted by the Chinese Civil War, which resulted in the political division of China into the People's Republic of China on mainland China and the Republic of China on Taiwan.
End of dynastic rule
A photograph of the Xuantong Emperor
, widely considered to be the last legitimate monarch of China, taken in AD 1922.
Dynastic rule in China collapsed in AD 1912 when the Republic of China superseded the Qing dynasty following the success of the Xinhai Revolution. While there were attempts after the Xinhai Revolution to reinstate dynastic rule in China, they were unsuccessful at consolidating their rule and gaining political legitimacy.
During the Xinhai Revolution, there were numerous proposals advocating for the replacement of the Manchu-led Qing dynasty by a new dynasty of Han ethnicity. Kong Lingyi (孔令貽), a 76th-generation descendant of Confucius and the holder of Duke Yansheng, was identified as a potential candidate for Chinese emperorship by Liang Qichao. Meanwhile, gentry in Anhui and Hebei supported a restoration of the Ming dynasty under Zhu Yuxun (朱煜勳), the Marquis of Extended Grace. Both suggestions were ultimately rejected.
The Empire of China (AD 1915–1916) proclaimed by Yuan Shikai sparked the National Protection War, resulting in the premature collapse of the regime 101 days later. The Manchu Restoration (AD 1917) was an unsuccessful attempt at reviving the Qing dynasty, lasting merely 11 days. Similarly, the Manchukuo (AD 1932–1945; monarchy since AD 1934), a puppet state of the Empire of Japan during World War II with limited diplomatic recognition, is not regarded as a legitimate regime. Ergo, historians usually consider the abdication of the Xuantong Emperor on 12 February 1912 as the end of the Chinese dynastic system. Dynastic rule in China lasted almost four millennia.
Imperial seal of the Qing dynasty
with "Dà Qīng Dìguó zhī xǐ
; "Seal of the Great Qing Empire") rendered in seal script
. Seals were a symbol of political authority and legitimacy.
China was politically divided during multiple periods in its history, with different regions ruled by different dynasties. These dynasties effectively functioned as separate states with their own court and political institutions. Political division existed during the Three Kingdoms, the Sixteen Kingdoms, the Northern and Southern dynasties, and the Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms periods, among others.
Relations between Chinese dynasties during periods of division often revolved around political legitimacy, which was derived from the doctrine of the Mandate of Heaven. Dynasties ruled by ethnic Han would proclaim rival dynasties founded by other ethnicities as illegitimate, usually justified based on the concept of Hua–Yi distinction. On the other hand, many dynasties of non-Han origin saw themselves as the legitimate dynasty of China and often sought to portray themselves as the true inheritor of Chinese culture and history. Traditionally, only regimes deemed as "legitimate" or "orthodox" (正統; zhèngtǒng) are termed cháo (朝; "dynasty"); "illegitimate" or "unorthodox" regimes are referred to as guó (國; usually translated as either "state" or "kingdom"[f]), even if these regimes were dynastic in nature. The issue of political legitimacy pertaining to some of these dynasties remains contentious in modern academia.
Such legitimacy dispute existed during the following periods:
- Three Kingdoms
- Eastern Jin and Sixteen Kingdoms
- The Eastern Jin proclaimed itself to be legitimate
- Several of the Sixteen Kingdoms such as the Han Zhao, the Later Zhao, and the Former Qin also claimed legitimacy
- Northern and Southern dynasties
- All dynasties during this period saw themselves as the legitimate representative of China; the Northern dynasties referred to their southern counterparts as "dǎoyí" (島夷; "island dwelling barbarians"), while the Southern dynasties called their northern neighbors "suǒlǔ" (索虜; "barbarians with braids")
- Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms
- Having directly succeeded the Tang dynasty, the Later Liang considered itself to be a legitimate dynasty
- The Later Tang regarded itself as the restorer of the earlier Tang dynasty and rejected the legitimacy of its predecessor, the Later Liang
- The Later Jin accepted the Later Tang as a legitimate regime
- The Southern Tang was, for a period of time, considered the legitimate dynasty during the Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms period
- Modern historiography generally considers the Five Dynasties, as opposed to the contemporary Ten Kingdoms, to be legitimate
- Liao dynasty, Song dynasty, and Jin dynasty
- Following the conquest of the Later Jin, the Liao dynasty claimed legitimacy and succession from it
- Both the Northern Song and Southern Song considered themselves to be the legitimate Chinese dynasty
- The Jin dynasty challenged the Song's claim of legitimacy
- The succeeding Yuan dynasty recognized all three in addition to the Western Liao as legitimate Chinese dynasties, culminating in the composition of the History of Liao, the History of Song, and the History of Jin
- Ming dynasty and Northern Yuan
- The Ming dynasty recognized the preceding Yuan dynasty as a legitimate Chinese dynasty, but asserted that it had succeeded the Mandate of Heaven from the Yuan, thus considering the Northern Yuan as illegitimate
- Northern Yuan rulers maintained the dynastic name "Great Yuan" and claimed Chinese titles continuously until AD 1388 or AD 1402; Chinese titles were restored on several occasions thereafter for brief periods
- The Mongol historian Rashipunsug argued that the Northern Yuan had succeeded the legitimacy from the Yuan dynasty; the Qing dynasty, which later defeated and annexed the Northern Yuan, inherited this legitimacy, thus rendering the Ming as illegitimate
- Qing dynasty and Southern Ming
- The Qing dynasty recognized the preceding Ming dynasty as legitimate, but asserted that it had succeeded the Mandate of Heaven from the Ming, thus refuting the claimed legitimacy of the Southern Ming
- The Southern Ming continued to claim legitimacy until its eventual defeat by the Qing
- The Ming loyalist Kingdom of Tungning in Taiwan denounced the Qing dynasty as illegitimate
- The Joseon dynasty of Korea and the Later Lê dynasty of Vietnam had at various times considered the Southern Ming, instead of the Qing dynasty, as legitimate
- The Tokugawa shogunate of Japan did not accept the legitimacy of the Qing dynasty and instead saw itself as the rightful representative of Huá (華; "China"); this narrative served as the basis of Japanese texts such as Chūchō Jijitsu and Kai Hentai
While periods of disunity often resulted in heated debates among officials and historians over which dynasty could and should be considered orthodox, the Northern Song statesman Ouyang Xiu propounded that such orthodoxy existed in a state of limbo during fragmented periods and was restored after political unification was achieved. From this perspective, the Song dynasty possessed legitimacy by virtue of its ability to end the Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms period despite not having succeeded the orthodoxy from the Later Zhou. Similarly, Ouyang considered the concept of orthodoxy to be in oblivion during the Three Kingdoms, the Sixteen Kingdoms, and the Northern and Southern dynasties periods.
As most Chinese historiographical sources uphold the idea of unilineal dynastic succession, only one dynasty could be considered orthodox at any given time. Most modern sources consider the legitimate line of succession to be as follows:
These historical legitimacy disputes are similar to the modern competing claims of legitimacy by the People's Republic of China based in Beijing and the Republic of China based in Taipei. Both regimes formally adhere to the One-China policy and claim to be the sole legitimate representative of the whole of China.
There were several groups of Chinese dynasties that were ruled by families with patrilineal relations, yet due to various reasons these regimes are considered to be separate dynasties and given distinct retroactive names for historiographical purpose. Such conditions as differences in their official dynastic title and fundamental changes having occurred to their rule would create the need for nomenclatural distinction, despite these dynasties sharing common ancestral origins.
Additionally, numerous other dynasties claimed descent from earlier dynasties as a calculated political move to obtain or enhance their legitimacy, even if such claims were unfounded.
The agnatic relations of the following groups of Chinese dynasties are typically recognized by historians:
A German map of the Chinese Empire during the height
of the Qing dynasty
. The Qing dynasty is considered to be a "Central Plain dynasty", a "unified dynasty", and a "conquest dynasty".
Central Plain dynasties
The Central Plain is a vast area on the lower reaches of the Yellow River which formed the cradle of Chinese civilization. "Central Plain dynasties" (中原王朝; Zhōngyuán wángcháo) refer to dynasties of China that had their capital cities situated within the Central Plain. This term could refer to dynasties of both Han and non-Han ethnic origins.
"Unified dynasties" (大一統王朝; dàyītǒng wángcháo) refer to dynasties of China, regardless of their ethnic origin, that achieved the unification of China proper. "China proper" is a region generally regarded as the traditional heartland of the Han people, and is not equivalent to the term "China". Imperial dynasties that had unified China proper may be known as the "Chinese Empire" or the "Empire of China" (中華帝國; Zhōnghuá Dìguó).
The concept of "great unity" or "grand unification" (大一統; dàyītǒng) was first mentioned in the Chinese classical text Gongyang Commentary on the Spring and Autumn Annals that was supposedly authored by the Qi scholar Gongyang Gao. Other prominent figures like Confucius and Mencius also touched upon this concept in their respective works.
Historians typically consider the following dynasties to have unified China proper: the Qin dynasty, the Western Han, the Xin dynasty, the Eastern Han, the Western Jin, the Sui dynasty, the Tang dynasty, the Wu Zhou, the Northern Song, the Yuan dynasty, the Ming dynasty, and the Qing dynasty. The status of the Northern Song as a unified dynasty is disputed among historians as the Sixteen Prefectures of Yan and Yun were partially administered by the contemporaneous Liao dynasty while the Western Xia exercised partial control over Hetao; the Northern Song, in this sense, did not truly achieve the unification of China proper.
"Conquest dynasties" (征服王朝; zhēngfú wángcháo) refer to dynasties of China founded by non-Han peoples that ruled parts or all of China proper. This term was first coined by the historian and sinologist Karl August Wittfogel and remains a source of controversy among scholars who believe that Chinese history should be analyzed and understood from a multiethnic and multicultural perspective. For instance, the Northern Wei and the Qing dynasty, established by the Xianbei and Manchu ethnicities respectively, are considered conquest dynasties of China.
It was customary for Chinese monarchs to adopt an official name for the realm, known as the guóhào (國號; "name of the state"), upon the establishment of a dynasty. During the rule of a dynasty, its guóhào functioned as the formal name of the state, both internally and for diplomatic purposes.
The formal name of Chinese dynasties was usually derived from one the following sources:
- The name of the ruling tribe or tribal confederation
- e.g., the Xia dynasty took its name from its ruling class, the Xia tribal confederation
- The noble title held by the dynastic founder prior to the founding of the dynasty
- The name of a historical state that occupied the same geographical location as the new dynasty
- The name of a previous dynasty from which the new dynasty claimed descent or succession from, even if such familial link was questionable
- A term with auspicious or other significant connotations
- e.g., the Yuan dynasty was officially the "Great Yuan", a name derived from a clause in the Classic of Changes, "dà zāi Qián Yuán" (大哉乾元; "Great is the Heavenly and Primal")
There were instances whereby the official name was changed during the reign of a dynasty. For example, the dynasty known retroactively as Southern Han initially used the name "Yue", only to be renamed to "Han" subsequently.
The official title of several dynasties bore the character "dà" (大; "great"). In Yongzhuang Xiaopin by the Ming historian Zhu Guozhen, it was claimed that the first dynasty to do so was the Yuan dynasty. However, several sources like the History of Liao and the History of Jin compiled by the Yuan historian Toqto'a revealed that the official dynastic name of some earlier dynasties such as the Liao and the Jin also contained the character "dà". It was also common for officials, subjects, or tributary states of a particular dynasty to include the term "dà" (or an equivalent term in other languages) when referring to this dynasty as a form of respect, even if the official dynastic name did not include it. For instance, The Chronicles of Japan referred to the Tang dynasty as "Ōkara" (大唐; "Great Tang") despite its dynastic name being simply "Tang".
While all dynasties of China sought to associate their respective realm with Zhōngguó (中國; "Central State"; usually translated as "Middle Kingdom" or "China" in English texts), none of these regimes officially used the term as their dynastic name. Although the Qing dynasty explicitly identified their state with and employed "Zhōngguó"—and its Manchu equivalent "Dulimbai Gurun" (ᡩᡠᠯᡳᠮᠪᠠᡳ
ᡤᡠᡵᡠᠨ)—in official capacity in numerous international treaties beginning with the Treaty of Nerchinsk dated AD 1689, its dynastic name had remained the "Great Qing". "Zhōngguó", which has become nearly synonymous with "China" in modern times, is a concept with geographical, political, and cultural connotations.
The adoption of guóhào, as well as the importance assigned to it, had promulgated within the Sinosphere. Notably, rulers of Vietnam and Korea also declared guóhào for their respective realm.
In Chinese historiography, historians generally do not refer to dynasties directly by their official name. Instead, historiographical names, which were most commonly derived from their official name, are used. For instance, the Sui dynasty is known as such because its formal name was "Sui". Likewise, the Jin dynasty was officially the "Great Jin".
When more than one dynasty shared the same Chinese character(s) as their formal name, as was common in Chinese history, prefixes are retroactively applied to dynastic names by historians in order to distinguish between these similarly-named regimes. Frequently used prefixes include:
- Cardinal direction
- Surname of the ruling family
- Other types of prefixes
- e.g., Shu Han (the prefix "Shu" is a reference to the realm's geographical location at Sichuan), Hu Xia (the prefix "Hu", meaning "barbarian", refers to the dynasty's Xiongnu origin)
A dynasty could be referred to by more than one retroactive name in Chinese historiography, albeit some are more widely used than others. For instance, the Western Han is also known as the "Former Han", and the Yang Wu is also called the "Southern Wu".
Scholars usually make a historiographical distinction for dynasties whose rule were interrupted. For example, the Song dynasty is divided into the Northern Song and the Southern Song, with the Jingkang Incident as the dividing line; the original "Song" founded by the Emperor Taizu of Song was therefore differentiated from the "Song" restored under the Emperor Gaozong of Song. In such cases, the regime had collapsed, only to be re-established; a nomenclatural distinction between the original regime and the new regime is thus necessary for historiographical purpose. Major exceptions to this historiographical practice include the Western Qin and the Tang dynasty, which were interrupted by the Later Qin and the Wu Zhou respectively.
In Chinese sources, the term "dynasty" (朝; cháo) is usually omitted when referencing dynasties that have prefixes in their historiographical names. Such a practice is sometimes adopted in English usage, even though the inclusion of the word "dynasty" is also widely seen in English scholarly writings. For example, the Northern Zhou is also sometimes referred to as the "Northern Zhou dynasty".
Often, scholars would refer to a specific Chinese dynasty by adding the word "China" after the dynastic name. For instance, "Tang China" refers to the Chinese state under the rule of the Tang dynasty and the corresponding historical era.
Approximate territories controlled by the various dynasties and states throughout Chinese history, juxtaposed with the modern Chinese border
While the earliest Chinese dynasties were established along the Yellow River and the Yangtze River in China proper, numerous Chinese dynasties later expanded beyond the region to encompass other territorial domains.
At various points in time, Chinese dynasties exercised control over China proper (including Hainan, Macau, and Hong Kong), Taiwan, Manchuria (both Inner Manchuria and Outer Manchuria), Sakhalin, Mongolia (both Inner Mongolia and Outer Mongolia), Vietnam, Tibet, Xinjiang, as well as parts of Central Asia, the Korean Peninsula, Afghanistan, and Siberia.
Territorially, the largest orthodox Chinese dynasty was either the Yuan dynasty or the Qing dynasty, depending on the historical source.[c] This discrepancy can be mainly attributed to the ambiguous northern border of the Yuan realm: whereas some sources describe the Yuan border as located to the immediate north of the northern shore of Lake Baikal, others posit that the Yuan dynasty reached as far north as the Arctic coast. In contrast, the borders of the Qing dynasty were demarcated and reinforced through a series of international treaties, and thus were more well-defined.
Apart from exerting direct control over the Chinese realm, various dynasties of China also maintained hegemony over other states and tribes through the Chinese tributary system. The Chinese tributary system first emerged during the Western Han and lasted until the 19th century AD when the Sinocentric order broke down.
The modern territorial claims of both the People's Republic of China and the Republic of China are inherited from the lands once held by the Qing dynasty at the time of its collapse.
List of major Chinese dynasties
This list includes only the major dynasties of China that are typically found in simplified forms of Chinese historical timelines. This list is neither comprehensive nor representative of Chinese history as a whole.
Dynasties of relatively great significance
Major time periods
Dynasties counted among the "Three Kingdoms"
Dynasties counted among the "Sixteen Kingdoms"[ac]
Dynasties counted among the "Southern dynasties" within the broader "Northern and Southern dynasties"
Dynasties counted among the "Ten Kingdoms" within the broader "Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms"
Criteria for inclusion
This list includes only the major dynasties of China that are typically found in simplified forms of Chinese historical timelines. There were many other dynastic regimes that existed within or overlapped with the boundaries defined in the scope of Chinese historical geography.[bt]
- Dynastic fiefs that existed within the fengjian system: e.g., State of Deng, State of Huo, State of Chu, State of Yiqu
- Dynastic chiefdoms that existed within the jimi and tusi systems: e.g., Chiefdom of Bozhou, Chiefdom of Shuidong, Chiefdom of Yongning, Chiefdom of Tsanlha
- Localized dynastic regimes: e.g., Nanyue, Tuyuhun, Dali Kingdom, Kingdom of Tungning
- Short-lived dynastic regimes: e.g., Zhai Wei, Later Liao, Chen Han, Shun dynasty
- Regional dynastic regimes that ruled an area historically or currently associated with "China": e.g., Rouran Khaganate, Tibetan Empire, Bohai, Kara-Khanid Khanate
Dynasties that belonged to the following categories are excluded from this list:
- Dynasties outside of "China" with full or partial Chinese ancestry: e.g., Early Lý dynasty of Vietnam, Thonburi dynasty of Siam
- Dynasties that ruled Chinese tributary states outside of "China": e.g., Đinh dynasty of Vietnam, First Shō dynasty of the Ryukyu Islands
- Dynasties outside of "China" which claimed to be "Zhōngguó", "Zhōnghuá" (中華; "China"), or "Xiǎo Zhōnghuá" (小中華; "Little China"): e.g., Joseon dynasty of Korea, Nguyễn dynasty of Vietnam
- Dynasties that ruled Sinicized states outside of "China": e.g., Baekje dynasty of Korea, Later Lê dynasty of Vietnam
Timeline of major historical periods
Timeline of major regimes
- ^ a b While the Xia dynasty is typically considered to be the first Chinese dynasty, numerous historical sources like the Book of Documents mentioned two other dynasties that preceded the Xia: the "Tang" (唐) and the "Yu" (虞) dynasties. The former is sometimes called the "Ancient Tang" (古唐) to distinguish it from other dynasties named "Tang". If the historicity of these earlier dynasties were attested, Yu the Great would not have been the initiator of dynastic rule in China.
- ^ All attempts at restoring monarchical and dynastic rule in China after the success of the Xinhai Revolution ended in failure. Hence, the abdication of the Xuantong Emperor in AD 1912 is typically regarded as the formal end of the Chinese monarchy.
- ^ a b As per modern historiographical norm, the "Yuan dynasty" in this article refers exclusively to the realm based in China. However, the Chinese-style dynastic name "Great Yuan" (大元) as proclaimed by the Emperor Shizu of Yuan was meant to be applied to the entire Mongol Empire. In spite of this, "Yuan dynasty" is rarely used in the broad sense of the definition by modern scholars due to the de facto disintegrated nature of the Mongol Empire.
- ^ In AD 1906, the Qing dynasty initiated a series of reforms under the auspices of the Empress Xiaoqinxian to transition to a constitutional monarchy. On 27 August 1908, the Principles of the Constitution (欽定憲法大綱) was promulgated and served as an outline for a full constitution originally intended to take effect 10 years later. On 3 November 1911, as a response to the ongoing Xinhai Revolution, the Qing dynasty issued the constitutional Nineteen Creeds (憲法重大信條十九條) which limited the power of the Qing emperor, marking the official transition to a constitutional monarchy. The Qing dynasty, however, was overthrown on 12 February 1912.
- ^ A powerful consort kin, usually a male, could force the reigning monarch to abdicate in his favor, thereby prompting a change in dynasty. For example, Wang Mang of the Xin dynasty was a nephew of the Empress Xiaoyuan who in turn was the spouse of the Western Han ruler, the Emperor Yuan of Han.
- ^ The term "kingdom" is potentially misleading as not all rulers held the title of king. For example, all sovereigns of the Cao Wei held the title huángdì (皇帝; "emperor") during their reign despite the realm being listed as one of the "Three Kingdoms". Similarly, monarchs of the Western Qin, one of the "Sixteen Kingdoms", bore the title wáng (王; usually translated as "prince" in English writings).
- ^ "Anterior" is employed in some sources in place of "Former".
- ^ "Latter" or "Posterior" is employed in some sources in place of "Later".
- ^ The English and Chinese names stated are historiographical nomenclature. These should not be confused with the guóhào officially proclaimed by each dynasty. A dynasty may be known by more than one historiographical name.
- ^ a b The English names shown are based on the Hanyu Pinyin renditions, the most common form of Mandarin romanization currently in adoption. Some scholarly works utilize the Wade–Giles system, which may differ drastically in the spelling of certain words. For instance, the Qing dynasty is rendered as "Ch῾ing dynasty" in Wade–Giles.
- ^ a b The Chinese characters shown are in Traditional Chinese. Some characters may have simplified versions that are currently used in mainland China. For instance, the characters for the Eastern Han are written as "東漢" in Traditional Chinese and "东汉" in Simplified Chinese.
- ^ While Chinese historiography tends to treat dynasties as being of specific ethnic stocks, there were some monarchs who had mixed heritage. For instance, the Jiaqing Emperor of the Manchu-led Qing dynasty was of mixed Manchu and Han descent, having derived his Han ancestry from his mother, the Empress Xiaoyichun.
- ^ The status of a dynasty was dependent upon the chief title bore by its monarch at any given time. For instance, since all monarchs of the Chen dynasty held the title of emperor during their reign, the Chen dynasty was of imperial status.
- ^ The monarchs listed were the de facto founders of dynasties. However, it was common for Chinese monarchs to posthumously honor earlier members of the family as monarchs. For instance, while the Later Jin was officially established by the Emperor Gaozu of Later Jin, four earlier members of the ruling house were posthumously accorded imperial titles, the most senior of which was Shi Jing who was conferred the temple name "Jingzu" (靖祖) and the posthumous name "Emperor Xiao'an" (孝安皇帝).
- ^ In addition to the ancestral name Si (姒), the ruling house of the Xia dynasty also bore the lineage name Xiahou (夏后).
- ^ a b c The dates given for the Xia dynasty, the Shang dynasty, and the Western Zhou prior to the start of the Gonghe Regency in 841 BC are derived from the Xia–Shang–Zhou Chronology Project.
- ^ a b The rule of the Xia dynasty was traditionally dated 2205–1766 BC as per the calculations made by the historian Liu Xin. Accordingly, the Xia dynasty lasted 399 years excluding the 40-year interregnum between the reign of Xiang and Shao Kang.
- ^ a b The Xia dynasty was interrupted by the rule of Yi and Han Zhuo for approximately 40 years. Sources disagree on the dates of the start and end of the interregnum. Chinese historiography does not make a distinction between the realm that existed prior to the interregnum and the restored realm. Xiang was the last ruler before the interregnum; Shao Kang was the first ruler after the interregnum.
- ^ a b The rule of the Shang dynasty was traditionally dated 1766–1122 BC as per the calculations made by the historian Liu Xin. Accordingly, the Shang dynasty lasted 644 years.
- ^ a b The Western Zhou (西周) and the Eastern Zhou (東周) are collectively known as the Zhou dynasty (周朝; Zhōu Cháo; Chou1 Ch῾ao2; ㄓㄡ ㄔㄠˊ).
- ^ a b The rule of the Western Zhou was traditionally dated 1122–771 BC as per the calculations made by the historian Liu Xin. Accordingly, the Western Zhou lasted 351 years.
- ^ a b c The terms "Chinese Empire" and "Empire of China" refer to the Chinese state under the rule of various imperial dynasties, particularly those that had unified China proper.
- ^ In addition to the ancestral name Ying (嬴), the ruling house of the Qin dynasty also bore the lineage name Zhao (趙).
- ^ a b The Western Han (西漢) and the Eastern Han (東漢) are collectively known as the Han dynasty (漢朝; Hàn Cháo; Han4 Ch῾ao2; ㄏㄢˋ ㄔㄠˊ).
- ^ a b Some historians consider 206 BC, the year in which the Emperor Gao of Han was proclaimed "King of Han", to be the start of the Western Han. Accordingly, the Western Han lasted 215 years.
- ^ Liu Ying was not officially enthroned and maintained the title huáng tàizǐ (皇太子; "crown prince") during the regency of Wang Mang. The last Western Han monarch who was officially enthroned was the Emperor Ping of Han.
- ^ a b The Western Jin (西晉) and the Eastern Jin (東晉) are collectively known as the Jin dynasty (晉朝; Jìn Cháo; Chin4 Ch῾ao2; ㄐㄧㄣˋ ㄔㄠˊ).
- ^ a b c The names of the Jin dynasty (晉朝) of the Sima clan and the Jin dynasty (金朝) of the Wanyan clan are rendered similarly using the Hanyu Pinyin system, even though they do not share the same Chinese character for "Jin".
- ^ a b The Sixteen Kingdoms are also referred to as the "Sixteen Kingdoms of the Five Barbarians" (五胡十六國; Wǔ Hú Shíliù Guó), although not all dynasties counted among the 16 were ruled by the "Five Barbarians".
- ^ The ruling house of the Han Zhao initially bore the surname Luandi (攣鞮). Liu (劉) was subsequently adopted as the surname prior to the establishment of the Han Zhao.
- ^ a b c Some historians consider AD 303, the year in which the Emperor Jing of Cheng Han declared the era name "Jianchu" (建初), to be the start of the Cheng Han. Accordingly, the Cheng Han was founded by the Emperor Jing of Cheng Han and lasted 44 years.
- ^ The ruling house of the Former Qin initially bore the surname Pu (蒲). The Emperor Huiwu of Former Qin subsequently adopted Fu (苻) as the surname in AD 349 prior to the establishment of the Former Qin.
- ^ a b c Some historians consider AD 350, the year in which the Emperor Huiwu of Former Qin was proclaimed "Prince of Three Qins", to be the start of the Former Qin. Accordingly, the Former Qin was founded by the Emperor Huiwu of Former Qin and lasted 44 years.
- ^ As Lan Han, surnamed Lan (蘭), was not a member of the Murong (慕容) clan by birth, his enthronement was not a typical dynastic succession.
- ^ a b The Emperor Huiyi of Yan was of Gaogouli descent. Originally surnamed Gao (高), he was an adopted member of the Murong (慕容) clan. His enthronement was therefore not a typical dynastic succession.
- ^ a b Depending on the status of the Emperor Huiyi of Yan, the Later Yan ended in either AD 407 or AD 409 and lasted either 23 years or 25 years.
- ^ a b The Emperor Huiyi of Yan could either be the last Later Yan monarch or the founder of the Northern Yan depending on the historian's characterization.
- ^ The Western Qin was interrupted by the Later Qin between AD 400 and AD 409. Chinese historiography does not make a distinction between the realm that existed up to AD 400 and the realm restored in AD 409. The Prince Wuyuan of Western Qin was both the last ruler before the interregnum and the first ruler after the interregnum.
- ^ a b The names of the Later Liang (後涼) of the Lü clan and the Later Liang (後梁) of the Zhu clan are rendered similarly using the Hanyu Pinyin system, even though they do not share the same Chinese character for "Liang".
- ^ a b Duan Ye, surnamed Duan (段), was of Han descent. The enthronement of the Prince Wuxuan of Northern Liang was therefore not a typical dynastic succession.
- ^ The ruling house of the Hu Xia initially bore the surname Luandi (攣鞮). Liu (劉) was adopted as the surname prior to the establishment of the Hu Xia. The Emperor Wulie of Hu Xia subsequently adopted Helian (赫連) as the surname in AD 413 after the establishment of the Hu Xia.
- ^ a b The Emperor Huiyi of Yan was of Gaogouli descent. Originally surnamed Gao (高), he was an adopted member of the Murong (慕容) clan. The enthronement of the Emperor Wencheng of Northern Yan was therefore not a typical dynastic succession.
- ^ a b Depending on the status of the Emperor Huiyi of Yan, the Northern Yan was established in either AD 407 or AD 409 and lasted either 29 years or 27 years.
- ^ The ruling house of the Northern Wei initially bore the surname Tuoba (拓跋). The Emperor Xiaowen of Northern Wei subsequently adopted Yuan (元) as the surname in AD 493 after the establishment of the Northern Wei.
- ^ The ruling house of the Eastern Wei initially bore the surname Tuoba (拓跋). The Emperor Xiaowen of Northern Wei subsequently adopted Yuan (元) as the surname in AD 493 prior to the establishment of the Eastern Wei.
- ^ The ruling house of the Western Wei initially bore the surname Tuoba (拓跋). The Emperor Xiaowen of Northern Wei subsequently adopted Yuan (元) as the surname in AD 493 prior to the establishment of the Western Wei, only for the Emperor Gong of Western Wei to restore the surname Tuoba in AD 554 after the establishment of the Western Wei.
- ^ The ruling house of the Sui dynasty initially bore the surname Yang (楊). The Western Wei later bestowed the surname Puliuru (普六茹) upon the family. The Emperor Wen of Sui subsequently restored Yang as the surname in AD 580 prior to the establishment of the Sui dynasty.
- ^ The ruling house of the Tang dynasty initially bore the surname Li (李). The Western Wei later bestowed the surname Daye (大野) upon the family. Li was subsequently restored as the surname in AD 580 prior to the establishment of the Tang dynasty.
- ^ The Tang dynasty was interrupted by the Wu Zhou between AD 690 and AD 705. Chinese historiography does not make a distinction between the realm that existed up to AD 690 and the realm restored in AD 705. The Emperor Ruizong of Tang was the last ruler before the interregnum; the Emperor Zhongzong of Tang was the first ruler after the interregnum.
- ^ The ruling house of the Later Tang initially bore the surname Zhuye (朱邪). The Emperor Xianzu of Later Tang subsequently adopted Li (李) as the surname in AD 869 prior to the establishment of the Later Tang.
- ^ The Emperor Mingzong of Later Tang, originally without surname, was an adopted member of the Li (李) clan. His enthronement was therefore not a typical dynastic succession.
- ^ a b Li Congke was of Han descent. Originally surnamed Wang (王), he was an adopted member of the Li (李) clan. His enthronement was therefore not a typical dynastic succession.
- ^ a b The names of the Later Jin (後晉) of the Shi clan and the Later Jin (後金) of the Aisin Gioro clan are rendered similarly using the Hanyu Pinyin system, even though they do not share the same Chinese character for "Jin".
- ^ The Emperor Shizong of Later Zhou, originally surnamed Chai (柴), was an adopted member of the Guo (郭) clan. His enthronement was therefore not a typical dynastic succession.
- ^ a b c Some historians consider AD 902, the year in which the Emperor Taizu of Yang Wu was proclaimed "Prince of Wu", to be the start of the Yang Wu. Accordingly, the Yang Wu was founded by the Emperor Taizu of Yang Wu and lasted 35 years.
- ^ As Zhu Wenjin, surnamed Zhu (朱), was not a member of the Wang (王) clan by birth, his enthronement was not a typical dynastic succession.
- ^ The ruling house of the Jingnan initially bore the surname Gao (高). The Prince Wuxin of Chu subsequently adopted Zhu (朱) as the surname, only to restore the surname Gao prior to the establishment of the Jingnan.
- ^ The ruling house of the Southern Tang initially bore the surname Li (李). The Emperor Liezu of Southern Tang subsequently adopted Xu (徐) as the surname, only to restore the surname Li in AD 939 after the establishment of the Southern Tang.
- ^ a b The Emperor Yingwu of Northern Han was of Han descent. Originally surnamed He (何), he was an adopted member of the Liu (劉) clan. His enthronement was therefore not a typical dynastic succession.
- ^ a b Some historians consider AD 907, the year in which the Emperor Taizu of Liao was proclaimed "Khagan of the Khitans", to be the start of the Liao dynasty. Accordingly, the Liao dynasty lasted 218 years.
- ^ a b Kuchlug, originally without surname, was of Naiman descent. As he was not a member of the Yelü (耶律) clan by birth, his enthronement was not a typical dynastic succession.
- ^ a b Some historians consider AD 1132, the year in which the Emperor Dezong of Western Liao was proclaimed "Gurkhan", to be the start of the Western Liao. Accordingly, the Western Liao lasted 86 years.
- ^ a b The Northern Song (北宋) and the Southern Song (南宋) are collectively known as the Song dynasty (宋朝; Sòng Cháo; Sung4 Ch῾ao2; ㄙㄨㄥˋ ㄔㄠˊ).
- ^ The ruling house of the Western Xia initially bore the surname Tuoba (拓跋). The Tang dynasty and the Song dynasty later bestowed the surnames Li (李) and Zhao (趙) upon the family respectively. The Emperor Jingzong of Western Xia subsequently adopted Weiming (嵬名) as the surname in AD 1032 prior to the establishment of the Western Xia.
- ^ a b Some historians consider AD 1260, the year in which the Emperor Shizu of Yuan was proclaimed "Khagan of the Great Mongol State" and declared the era name "Zhongtong" (中統), to be the start of the Yuan dynasty. Accordingly, the Yuan dynasty lasted 108 years.
- ^ a b Choros Esen, surnamed Choros (綽羅斯), was of Oirat descent. As he was not a member of the Borjigin (孛兒只斤) clan by birth, his enthronement was not a typical dynastic succession.
- ^ a b c Traditional Chinese historiography considers the Northern Yuan to have ended in either AD 1388 or AD 1402 when the dynastic name "Great Yuan" was abolished. Accordingly, the Northern Yuan lasted either 20 years or 34 years, and its last ruler was either the Tianyuan Emperor or the Örüg Temür Khan. However, some historians regard the Mongol regime that existed from AD 1388 or AD 1402 up to AD 1635—referred to in the History of Ming as "Dada" (韃靼)—as a direct continuation of the Northern Yuan.
- ^ a b c Some historians consider AD 1664, the year in which the reign of the Dingwu Emperor came to an end, to be the end of the Southern Ming. Accordingly, the Southern Ming lasted 20 years and its last ruler was the Dingwu Emperor. However, the existence and identity of the Dingwu Emperor, supposedly reigned from AD 1646 to AD 1664, are disputed.
- ^ The Jurchen ethnic group was renamed "Manchu" in AD 1635 by the Emperor Taizong of Qing.
- ^ The Articles of Favorable Treatment of the Great Qing Emperor After His Abdication (關於大清皇帝辭位之後優待之條件) allowed the Xuantong Emperor to retain his imperial title and enjoy other privileges following his abdication, resulting in the existence of a titular court in the Forbidden City known as the "Remnant Court of the Abdicated Qing Imperial Family" (遜清皇室小朝廷) between AD 1912 and AD 1924. Feng Yuxiang revoked the privileges and abolished the titular court in AD 1924.
- ^ The Qing dynasty was briefly restored between 1 July 1917 and 12 July 1917 when Zhang Xun reinstalled the Xuantong Emperor to the Chinese throne. Due to the abortive nature of the event, it is usually excluded from Qing history.
- ^ As proposed by scholars such as Tan Qixiang, the geographical extent covered in the study of Chinese historical geography largely corresponds with the territories once ruled by the Qing dynasty during its territorial peak between the AD 1750s and the AD 1840s, prior to the outbreak of the First Opium War. At its height, the Qing dynasty exercised jurisdiction over an area larger than 13 million km2, encompassing:
Modern Chinese historiography considers all regimes, regardless of the ethnicity of the ruling class, that were established within or overlapped with the above geographical boundaries to be part of Chinese history. Similarly, all ethnic groups that were active within the above geographical boundaries are considered ethnicities of China. Regions outside of the above geographical boundaries but were under Chinese rule during various historical periods are included in the histories of the relevant Chinese dynasties.
- ^ The dynastic regimes included in this timeline are the same as the list above.
- ^ Nadeau, Randall (2012). The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Chinese Religions. p. 31. ISBN 9781444361971.
- ^ Yeo, Khiok-Khng (2008). Musing with Confucius and Paul: Toward a Chinese Christian Theology. p. 24. ISBN 9780227903308.
- ^ Chao, Yuan-ling (2009). Medicine and Society in Late Imperial China: A Study of Physicians in Suzhou, 1600–1850. p. 73. ISBN 9781433103810.
- ^ Wang, Shumin (2002). "夏、商、周之前还有个虞朝". Hebei Academic Journal. 22 (1): 146–147. Retrieved 20 August 2020.
- ^ "古唐朝存在没？它是比虞朝夏朝更早的一个神秘王朝？". Retrieved 21 August 2020.
- ^ Skutsch, Carl (2013). Encyclopedia of the World's Minorities. p. 287. ISBN 9781135193881.
- ^ a b Keay, John (2010). China: A History. ISBN 9780007372089.
- ^ Wang, Yeyang; Zhao, Qingyun (2016). 当代中国近代史理论研究. ISBN 9787516188231.
- ^ Twitchett, Denis; Fairbank, John; Mote, Frederick (1978). The Cambridge History of China. pp. 394–395. ISBN 9780521243339.
- ^ a b c Sadow, Lauren; Peeters, Bert; Mullan, Kerry (2019). Studies in Ethnopragmatics, Cultural Semantics, and Intercultural Communication: Minimal English (and Beyond). p. 100. ISBN 9789813299795.
- ^ a b Bauch, Martin; Schenk, Gerrit (2019). The Crisis of the 14th Century: Teleconnections between Environmental and Societal Change?. p. 153. ISBN 9783110660784.
- ^ a b Ruan, Jiening; Zhang, Jie; Leung, Cynthia (2015). Chinese Language Education in the United States. p. 9. ISBN 9783319213088.
- ^ a b Wei, Chao-hsin (1988). The General Themes of the Ocean Culture World. p. 17.
- ^ a b Adler, Philip; Pouwels, Randall (2011). World Civilizations: Volume I: To 1700. p. 373. ISBN 9781133171065.
- ^ a b c Rowe, William (2010). China's Last Empire: The Great Qing. p. 1. ISBN 9780674054554.
- ^ Robinson, David (2019). In the Shadow of the Mongol Empire: Ming China and Eurasia. p. 50. ISBN 9781108482448.
- ^ Robinson, David (2009). Empire's Twilight: Northeast Asia Under the Mongols. p. 293. ISBN 9780674036086.
- ^ Brook, Timothy; Walt van Praag, Michael van; Boltjes, Miek (2018). Sacred Mandates: Asian International Relations since Chinggis Khan. p. 45. ISBN 9780226562933.
- ^ Nevus, John (1996). China and the Chinese. p. 22. ISBN 9788120606906.
- ^ Wang, Hongsheng (2007). 历史的瀑布与峡谷：中华文明的文化结构和现代转型. p. 139. ISBN 9787300081830.
- ^ "中国历代正统皇朝—天朝上国名称的起因来源". Retrieved 21 August 2020.
- ^ a b "陆大鹏谈翻译：历史上的"王朝"与"皇朝"". Retrieved 4 August 2020.
- ^ Ebrey, Patricia; Liu, Kwang-Ching (2010). The Cambridge Illustrated History of China. p. 10. ISBN 9780521124331.
- ^ a b Chan, Joseph (2013). Confucian Perfectionism: A Political Philosophy for Modern Times. p. 213. ISBN 9781400848690.
- ^ Koenig, Lion; Chaudhuri, Bidisha (2017). Politics of the 'Other' in India and China: Western Concepts in Non-Western Contexts. p. 157. ISBN 9781317530558.
- ^ Gao, Quanxi; Zhang, Wei; Tian, Feilong (2015). The Road to the Rule of Law in Modern China. p. 135. ISBN 9783662456378.
- ^ To, Michael (2017). China's Quest for a Modern Constitutional Polity: from dynastic empires to modern republics. p. 54.
- ^ Whitaker, Donald; Shinn, Rinn-Sup (1972). Area Handbook for the People's Republic of China. p. 37.
- ^ Xiong, Deshan (2015). Social History Of China. p. 95. ISBN 9781938368264.
- ^ Qi, Zhixiang (2016). 中國現當代人學史：思想演變的時代特徵及其歷史軌跡. p. 21. ISBN 9789869244923.
- ^ a b Perdue, Peter (2009). China Marches West: The Qing Conquest of Central Eurasia. p. 6. ISBN 9780674042025.
- ^ Elleman, Bruce; Paine, Sarah (2019). Modern China: Continuity and Change, 1644 to the Present. p. 19. ISBN 9781538103876.
- ^ Zheng, Yongnian; Huang, Yanjie (2018). Market in State: The Political Economy of Domination in China. p. 83. ISBN 9781108473446.
- ^ "我国古代改朝换代的方式不外乎两种，哪种才是主流？". Retrieved 18 November 2019.
- ^ Fan, Shuzhi (2007). 国史精讲. p. 99. ISBN 9787309055634.
- ^ a b Wilkinson, Endymion (2000). Chinese History: A Manual. p. 14. ISBN 9780674002494.
- ^ Perkins, Dorothy (2013). Encyclopedia of China: History and Culture. p. 1. ISBN 9781135935627.
- ^ Di Cosmo, Nicola (2007). The Diary of a Manchu Soldier in Seventeenth-Century China: "My Service in the Army", by Dzengseo. p. 1. ISBN 9781135789558.
- ^ Elman, Benjamin (2006). A Cultural History of Modern Science in China. p. 46. ISBN 9780674023062.
- ^ Tanner, Harold (2009). China: A History. p. 335. ISBN 978-0872209152.
- ^ Pines, Yuri (2012). The Everlasting Empire: The Political Culture of Ancient China and Its Imperial Legacy. p. 157. ISBN 978-0691134956.
- ^ Mote, Frederick (2003). Imperial China 900-1800. p. 798. ISBN 9780674012127.
- ^ Skaff, Jonathan (2012). Sui-Tang China and Its Turko-Mongol Neighbors: Culture, Power, and Connections, 580-800. p. 80. ISBN 9780199734139.
- ^ "封二王三恪昭示正统，周朝首创历代延续，明清却不敢采用". Retrieved 30 August 2020.
- ^ Gong, Yin (2006). 中国民族政策史. p. 253.
- ^ Zhang, Cheng (2007). 禅让：中国历史上的一种权力游戏. p. 200. ISBN 9787801066961.
- ^ Stunkel, Kenneth (2012). Fifty Key Works of History and Historiography. p. 143. ISBN 9781136723667.
- ^ Horner, Charles (2010). Rising China and Its Postmodern Fate: Memories of Empire in a New Global Context. p. 59. ISBN 9780820335889.
- ^ a b Moody, Alys; Ross, Stephen (2020). Global Modernists on Modernism: An Anthology. p. 282. ISBN 9781474242349.
- ^ Grosse, Christine (2019). The Global Manager's Guide to Cultural Literacy. p. 71. ISBN 9781527533875.
- ^ Rošker, Jana; Suhadolnik, Nataša (2014). Modernisation of Chinese Culture: Continuity and Change. p. 74. ISBN 9781443867726.
- ^ Aldrich, M. A. (2008). The Search for a Vanishing Beijing: A Guide to China's Capital Through the Ages. p. 176. ISBN 9789622097773.
- ^ Schillinger, Nicholas (2016). The Body and Military Masculinity in Late Qing and Early Republican China: The Art of Governing Soldiers. p. 176. ISBN 9781498531696.
- ^ a b Hao, Shiyuan (2019). China's Solution to Its Ethno-national Issues. p. 51. ISBN 9789813295193.
- ^ Wells, Anne (2009). The A to Z of World War II: The War Against Japan. p. 167. ISBN 9780810870260.
- ^ Wu, Bin (2019). Government Performance Management in China: Theory and Practice. pp. 44–45. ISBN 9789811382253.
- ^ "历史上的国和代到底有什么区别？". Retrieved 18 November 2019.
- ^ Besio, Kimberly (2012). Three Kingdoms and Chinese Culture. p. 64. ISBN 9780791480496.
- ^ Baaquie, Belal Ehsan; Wang, Qing-Hai (2018). "Chinese Dynasties and Modern China: Unification and Fragmentation". China and the World: Ancient and Modern Silk Road. 1 (1): 5. doi:10.1142/S2591729318500037.
- ^ Nosco, Peter (1997). Confucianism and Tokugawa Culture. p. 68. ISBN 9780824818654.
- ^ Holcombe, Charles (2017). A History of East Asia. pp. 62–63. ISBN 9781107118737.
- ^ Yang, Shao-yun (2019). The Way of the Barbarians: Redrawing Ethnic Boundaries in Tang and Song China. p. 63. ISBN 9780295746012.
- ^ Chen, Huaiyu (2007). The Revival of Buddhist Monasticism in Medieval China. p. 24. ISBN 9780820486246.
- ^ Wakeman, Frederic (1985). The Great Enterprise: The Manchu Reconstruction of Imperial Order in Seventeenth-century China, Volume 1. p. 446. ISBN 9780520048041.
- ^ a b c d e f Liu, Pujiang (2017). 正统与华夷：中国传统政治文化研究. ISBN 9787101125795.
- ^ a b c Lee, Thomas (2000). Education in Traditional China: A History. p. 238. ISBN 9004103635.
- ^ Ng, On Cho; Wang, Edward (2005). Mirroring the Past: The Writing And Use of History in Imperial China. p. 177. ISBN 9780824829131.
- ^ "宋和辽究竟哪个才是正统王朝？". Retrieved 18 November 2019.
- ^ Brook, Walt van Praag & Boltjes (2018). p. 52.
- ^ Biran, Michal (2005). The Empire of the Qara Khitai in Eurasian History: Between China and the Islamic World. p. 93. ISBN 9780521842266.
- ^ "试论清人的辽金"正统观"——以辽宋金"三史分修""各与正统"问题讨论为中心". Retrieved 18 November 2019.
- ^ Zhang, Feng (2015). Chinese Hegemony: Grand Strategy and International Institutions in East Asian History. p. 126. ISBN 9780804795043.
- ^ Brook, Walt van Praag & Boltjes (2018). p. 54.
- ^ Chan, Wing-ming (2000). East Asian History, Issues 19-20. p. 30.
- ^ Fang, Weigui (2019). Modern Notions of Civilization and Culture in China. p. 30. ISBN 9789811335587.
- ^ Baldanza, Kathlene (2016). Ming China and Vietnam. p. 206. ISBN 9781107124240.
- ^ Davis, Bret (2019). The Oxford Handbook of Japanese Philosophy. p. 294. ISBN 9780199945726.
- ^ Ng, Wai-ming (2019). Imagining China in Tokugawa Japan: Legends, Classics, and Historical Terms. p. xvii. ISBN 9781438473086.
- ^ Zhang, Xiaoling (2014). 從現代到後現代的自我追尋：夏目漱石與村上春樹的比較研究. p. 224. ISBN 9789863263012.
- ^ a b Wu, Huaiqi (2018). An Historical Sketch of Chinese Historiography. p. 322. ISBN 9783662562536.
- ^ Hudson, Christopher (2014). The China Handbook. p. 59. ISBN 9781134269662.
- ^ a b Law, Eugene (2004). Best of China. p. 11. ISBN 9787508504292.
- ^ a b Li, Xiaobing (2012). China at War: An Encyclopedia. p. 485. ISBN 9781598844160.
- ^ a b Mao, Zengyin (2005). 三字经与中国民俗画. p. 90. ISBN 9787508507996.
- ^ a b Wang, Shoufa (2002). 中国政治制度史. p. 80. ISBN 9787209030762.
- ^ a b Li, Xiaobing; Shan, Patrick (2015). Ethnic China: Identity, Assimilation, and Resistance. p. 5. ISBN 9781498507295.
- ^ a b "Chinese Empire". Retrieved 9 January 2020.
- ^ a b "经常提到的波斯帝国，那你知道波斯第一、第二、第三帝国吗？". Retrieved 13 January 2020.
- ^ Feng, Tianyu; Yang, Hua (2000). 中国文化发展轨迹. p. 111.
- ^ Jia, Bingqiang; Zhu, Xiaohong (2015). 图说治水与中华文明. ISBN 9787517031246.
- ^ Wang, Xilong (2009). 历史文化探研──兰州大学历史文化学院专门史论文集. ISBN 9787542114525.
- ^ Yang, Faxing (2015). 世界伟人传记丛书（上）.
- ^ Gao, Qi (2018). 传统文化与治国理政. ISBN 9787101127669.
- ^ a b "中国历史上十个大一统王朝，其中四个国祚不过百年". Retrieved 18 November 2019.
- ^ "我国历史上这两大王朝均是大一统王朝，却教科书上却极少被提及". Retrieved 24 January 2020.
- ^ Graff, David; Higham, Robin (2012). A Military History of China. pp. 70–71. ISBN 978-0813140674.
- ^ a b van de Ven, Hans (2000). Warfare in Chinese History. p. 77. ISBN 9004117741.
- ^ Bulag, Uradyn (2010). Collaborative Nationalism: The Politics of Friendship on China's Mongolian Frontier. pp. 56–57. ISBN 9781442204331.
- ^ Wilkinson (2000). pp. 13–14.
- ^ Zhu, Fayuan; Wu, Qixing (2000). 中国文化ABC. ISBN 9787210045892.
- ^ a b c d "历代王朝国号的分类". Retrieved 18 November 2019.
- ^ a b c d e "名不正则言不顺：中国各朝代名称、国号的由来". Retrieved 18 November 2019.
- ^ "唐朝的皇帝姓李，为什么不叫李朝而叫唐朝？". Retrieved 18 November 2019.
- ^ a b "先秦时期的诸侯国名，哪些最受后世的青睐？". Retrieved 18 November 2019.
- ^ "后周皇帝列表及简介 后周太祖世宗恭帝简介 后周是怎么灭亡的". Retrieved 18 November 2019.
- ^ Hung, Hing Ming (2016). From the Mongols to the Ming Dynasty: How a Begging Monk Became Emperor of China, Zhu Yuan Zhang. p. 13. ISBN 9781628941524.
- ^ "南越国与南汉国". Retrieved 18 November 2019.
- ^ Hu, Axiang; Song, Yanmei (2008). 中国国号的故事. p. 171. ISBN 9787807135999.
- ^ a b "明朝为何定国号为"大明"，绝大部分人只知道五个原因中的一个". Retrieved 6 January 2020.
- ^ "辽朝国号考释". Retrieved 6 January 2020.
- ^ Chan, Hok-lam (2003). 金宋史論叢. pp. 4–5. ISBN 9789629960971.
- ^ Fogel, Joshua (2015). The Cultural Dimensions of Sino-Japanese Relations: Essays on the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. p. 66. ISBN 9781317457671.
- ^ Xie, Xuanjun (2016). 士商工农──等级制度构建文明社会. p. 379. ISBN 9781329980136.
- ^ Wang, Yuanchong (2018). Remaking the Chinese Empire: Manchu-Korean Relations, 1616–1911. pp. 52–53. ISBN 9781501730511.
- ^ Wang, Fei-Ling (2017). The China Order: Centralia, World Empire, and the Nature of Chinese Power. p. 11. ISBN 9781438467504.
- ^ Kang, Jung In (2015). Western-Centrism and Contemporary Korean Political Thought. p. 71. ISBN 9780739180990.
- ^ "为何中国古代的一些朝代前要加上"东西南北"，比如"西汉"呢？". Retrieved 18 November 2019.
- ^ Christopher, James (1970). Conflict in the Far East. p. 5.
- ^ Deghati, Reza; Giès, Jacques; Feugère, Laure; Coutin, André (2002). Painted Buddhas of Xinjiang: Hidden Treasures from the Silk Road. p. 43. ISBN 9781588860279.
- ^ Chang, Chun-shu (2007). The Rise of the Chinese Empire: Frontier, immigration, and empire in Han China, 130 B.C.–A.D. 157. pp. 179–180. ISBN 9780472115341.
- ^ Swope, Kenneth (2014). The Military Collapse of China's Ming Dynasty, 1618–44. p. 223. ISBN 9781134462094.
- ^ Dardess, John (2019). More Than the Great Wall: The Northern Frontier and Ming National Security, 1368–1644. p. 512. ISBN 9781538135112.
- ^ Wang, Guo'an (2007). A Handbook for 1,000 Basic Chinese Characters. p. 828. ISBN 9789629962838.
- ^ Zhao, Ziqiang (2001). 私家藏宝：粤桂港澳台私人藏品珍集. p. 7. ISBN 9787806740989.
- ^ Loewe, Michael (2006). The Government of the Qin and Han Empires: 221 BCE – 220 CE. p. vi. ISBN 9781603840576.
- ^ "五代十国时期的十国政权之一：南吴的发展史". Retrieved 8 August 2020.
- ^ Chan, Chi Chuen; Li, William; Chiu, Amy (2019). The Psychology of Chinese Gambling: A Cultural and Historical Perspective. p. 21. ISBN 9789811334863.
- ^ "先秦、秦国、秦朝、前秦、后秦、西秦是什么关系？". Retrieved 4 August 2020.
- ^ "汉分东西汉因为中间有新莽为什么唐朝中间有武周却不分东西唐". Retrieved 4 August 2020.
- ^ Yuan, Haiwang (2010). This is China: The First 5,000 Years. p. 40. ISBN 9781933782768.
- ^ Hammond, Kenneth; Beezley, William; DeBlasi, Anthony; MacLachlan, Colin (2002). The Human Tradition in Premodern China. p. 77. ISBN 9780842029599.
- ^ a b Brødsgaard, Kjeld (2008). Hainan – State, Society, and Business in a Chinese Province. p. 11. ISBN 9781134045471.
- ^ a b Wong, Koon-kwai (2009). Hong Kong, Macau and the Pearl River Delta: A Geographical Survey. pp. 241–242. ISBN 9789882004757.
- ^ a b Zhang, Wei Bin (2006). Hong Kong: The Pearl Made of British Mastery and Chinese Docile-diligence. p. 3. ISBN 9781594546006.
- ^ a b Hughes, Christopher (2013). Taiwan and Chinese Nationalism: National Identity and Status in International Society. p. 21. ISBN 9781134727551.
- ^ a b c Hsu, Cho-yun (2012). China: A New Cultural History. p. 421. ISBN 9780231528184.
- ^ a b c d e f Lockard, Craig (2020). Societies, Networks, and Transitions: A Global History. p. 260. ISBN 9780357365472.
- ^ a b c Gan, Chunsong (2019). A Concise Reader of Chinese Culture. p. 24. ISBN 9789811388675.
- ^ a b Westad, Odd (2012). Restless Empire: China and the World Since 1750. p. 11. ISBN 9780465029365.
- ^ a b Sanders, Alan (2003). Historical Dictionary of Mongolia. p. v. ISBN 9780810866010.
- ^ a b Paige, Jeffrey (1978). Agrarian Revolution. p. 278. ISBN 9780029235508.
- ^ a b Clarke, Michael (2011). Xinjiang and China's Rise in Central Asia - A History. p. 16. ISBN 9781136827068.
- ^ a b Kshetry, Gopal (2008). Foreigners in Japan: A Historical Perspective. p. 25. ISBN 9781469102443.
- ^ a b Tanner (2009). p. 167.
- ^ Lockard (2020). p. 262.
- ^ Hsu (2012). p. 268.
- ^ History of the World Map by Map. 2018. p. 133. ISBN 9780241379189.
- ^ Tan, Qixiang, ed. (1982). "元时期全图（一）". The Historical Atlas of China.
- ^ Tan, Qixiang, ed. (1982). "元时期全图（二）". The Historical Atlas of China.
- ^ Kavalski, Emilian (2014). Asian Thought on China's Changing International Relations. pp. 56–57. ISBN 9781137299338.
- ^ Rand, Christopher (2017). Military Thought in Early China. p. 142. ISBN 9781438465180.
- ^ Brown, Kerry (2018). China's 19th Party Congress: Start Of A New Era. p. 197. ISBN 9781786345936.
- ^ Tanner (2009). p. 419.
- ^ Esherick, Joseph; Kayali, Hasan; Van Young, Eric (2006). Empire to Nation: Historical Perspectives on the Making of the Modern World. p. 245. ISBN 9780742578159.
- ^ Zhai, Zhiyong (2017). 憲法何以中國. p. 190. ISBN 9789629373214.
- ^ Gao, Quanxi (2016). 政治憲法與未來憲制. p. 273. ISBN 9789629372910.
- ^ "Qing dynasty". Retrieved 18 November 2019.
- ^ "中国历史上的十大混血皇帝，有人居然有黑人血统". Retrieved 5 March 2020.
- ^ Zhu, Weizheng (2015). Rereading Modern Chinese History. p. 301. ISBN 9789004293311.
- ^ Li, Xueqin (2004). 中國古代文明與國家形成硏究. p. 358. ISBN 9789867938251.
- ^ Zheng, Wang (2012). Never Forget National Humiliation: Historical Memory in Chinese Politics and Foreign Relations. p. 44. ISBN 9780231520164.
- ^ a b c Ivanhoe, Philip; Van Norden, Bryan (2005). Readings in Classical Chinese Philosophy. p. 385. ISBN 9781603844901.
- ^ Tan, Koon San (2014). Dynastic China: An Elementary History. p. 8. ISBN 9789839541885.
- ^ a b Shang, Long; Yang, Fei (2005). 中国考古地图. p. 56. ISBN 9787801459169.
- ^ Westmoreland, Perry (2019). Life's Wonders. ISBN 9781644268346.
- ^ a b Tan (2014). p. 17.
- ^ a b Loh, Shen Yeow (2019). Descendants of the Bird Hunters of Old China. ISBN 9781543755633.
- ^ Wu, Dongping (2013). 名人取名的故事. ISBN 9787216072298.
- ^ Shaughnessy, Edward (2014). Unearthing the Changes: Recently Discovered Manuscripts of the Yi Jing (I Ching) and Related Texts. p. 19. ISBN 9780231533300.
- ^ Zhang, Qizhi (2015). An Introduction to Chinese History and Culture. p. 92. ISBN 9783662464823.
- ^ Earnshaw, Graham (2004). China Economic Review's China Business Guide 2005. p. 30. ISBN 9781933782768.
- ^ Wang, Jiafan (1999). 中华古文明史辞典. p. 490. ISBN 9787805182773.
- ^ McLeod, Alexus (2016). Astronomy in the Ancient World: Early and Modern Views on Celestial Events. p. 85. ISBN 9783319236001.
- ^ Tse, Wicky (2018). The Collapse of China's Later Han Dynasty, 25-220 AD: The Northwest Borderlands and the Edge of Empire. ISBN 9781315532318.
- ^ Pei, Kuangyi (2018). Gale Researcher Guide for: The Three Kingdoms and the Jin. ISBN 9781535865692.
- ^ Dai, Meike; Wei, Weisen (2016). 幻化之龍：兩千年中國歷史變遷中的孔子. p. 122. ISBN 9789629966485.
- ^ Fu, Chonglan; Cao, Wenming (2019). Introduction to the Urban History of China. p. 123. ISBN 9789811382079.
- ^ Zhou, Jiarong (2017). 香港通史：遠古至清代. p. 41. ISBN 9789620441660.
- ^ Mai, Jinsheng (2017). 近代中國海防史新論. p. 254. ISBN 9789620440472.
- ^ Wang, Eugene (2005). Shaping the Lotus Sutra: Buddhist Visual Culture in Medieval China. p. 13. ISBN 9780295984629.
- ^ Gernet, Jacques (1996). A History of Chinese Civilization. p. 186. ISBN 9780521497817.
- ^ Shen, Songying (2016). 闲读中国史. ISBN 9787210081692.
- ^ Zhou, Weizhou (2006). 汉赵国史. p. 2. ISBN 9787563359943.
- ^ Xu, Junyuan; Zhang, Zhanjun; Shi, Yuxin (1986). 贵姓何来. p. 65.
- ^ McMahon, Keith (2013). Women Shall Not Rule: Imperial Wives and Concubines in China from Han to Liao. p. 123. ISBN 9781442222908.
- ^ Fan, Ru; Pan, Xinghui (2010). 中外歷史大事年表. p. 213. ISBN 9789628931736.
- ^ Wong, Dorothy (2004). Chinese Steles: Pre-Buddhist and Buddhist Use of a Symbolic Form. ISBN 9780824827830.
- ^ Swartz, Wendy; Yang, Lu; Jessy, Choo (2014). Early Medieval China: A Sourcebook. p. 30. ISBN 9780231531009.
- ^ Whiteman, Stephen (2019). Where Dragon Veins Meet: The Kangxi Emperor and His Estate at Rehe. p. 225. ISBN 9780295745817.
- ^ a b Duthie, Torquil (2014). Man'yōshū and the Imperial Imagination in Early Japan. p. 27. ISBN 9789004264540.
- ^ a b Chen, Zaiming (2004). 人物評話：古今人物逍遙遊. p. 82. ISBN 9789573253327.
- ^ Silk, Jonathan (2013). Buddhism in China: Collected Papers of Erik Zürcher. p. 589. ISBN 9789004263291.
- ^ Liu, Xueyao (2005). 歷代胡族王朝之民族政策. p. 41. ISBN 9789867151018.
- ^ a b c Liu, Xueyao (2012). 鮮卑列國：大興安嶺傳奇. ISBN 9789628904327.
- ^ Steinhardt, Nancy (2014). Chinese Architecture in an Age of Turmoil, 200-600. p. 28. ISBN 9780824838232.
- ^ Xiao, Shiyou (2013). 後秦政治外交史簡論五篇. p. 69. ISBN 9789881278982.
- ^ Adamek, Piotr (2017). Good Son is Sad If He Hears the Name of His Father: The Tabooing of Names in China as a Way of Implementing Social Values. p. 344. ISBN 9781351565219.
- ^ Zhao, Yonghong (2010). 河西走廊藏文化史要. ISBN 9787542117083.
- ^ Liu, Xingchu (2009). 甘肃文史精萃1：史料卷. ISBN 9787999033417.
- ^ Lü, Fu (2017). 历代兴衰演义. p. 154.
- ^ Qin, Dashu; Yuan, Jian (2013). 2011：古丝绸之路. p. 153. ISBN 9789813206076.
- ^ Wan, Guoding; Wan, Sinian; Chen, Mengjia (2018). 中国历史纪年表（精）. ISBN 9787101133172.
- ^ Zhang, Qizhi; Wang, Zijin; Fang, Guanghua (2002). 秦汉魏晋南北朝史. p. 335. ISBN 9789571128702.
- ^ "匈奴嬌子的赫連大夏國". Retrieved 6 September 2020.
- ^ a b Kim, Hyun Jin (2015). The Huns. ISBN 9781317340911.
- ^ Hong, Yuan (2018). The Sinitic Civilization Book II: A Factual History Through the Lens of Archaeology, Bronzeware, Astronomy, Divination, Calendar and the Annals. ISBN 9781532058318.
- ^ Tian, Hengyu (2018). Infamous Chinese Emperors: Tales of Tyranny and Misrule. p. 180. ISBN 9789812299314.
- ^ Wang, Zhen'guo; Chen, Ping; Xie, Peiping (1999). History and Development of Traditional Chinese Medicine. p. 94. ISBN 9787030065674.
- ^ a b c d e f Xiong, Victor (2017). Historical Dictionary of Medieval China. p. 613. ISBN 9781442276161.
- ^ Fairbank, John; Goldman, Merle (2006). China: A New History. p. 73. ISBN 9780674018280.
- ^ a b c d Spring, Peter (2015). Great Walls and Linear Barriers. p. 211. ISBN 9781473854048.
- ^ Holcombe, Charles (2001). The Genesis of East Asia: 221 B.C.–A.D. 907. p. 140. ISBN 9780824824655.
- ^ Tan, Zhongchi (2013). 长沙通史（古代卷）. ISBN 9787999009009.
- ^ Kroll, Paul (2014). Reading Medieval Chinese Poetry: Text, Context, and Culture. p. 36. ISBN 9789004282063.
- ^ Nadeau, Randall (2012). The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Chinese Religions. p. 147. ISBN 9781444361971.
- ^ Katz, Paul (1995). Demon Hordes and Burning Boats: The Cult of Marshal Wen in Late Imperial Chekiang. p. 79. ISBN 9781438408484.
- ^ Cai, Zong-qi (2007). How to Read Chinese Poetry: A Guided Anthology. p. 152. ISBN 9780231511889.
- ^ Knechtges, David; Chang, Taiping (2014). Ancient and Early Medieval Chinese Literature: A Reference Guide. p. 1818. ISBN 9789004271852.
- ^ Lee, Mosol (2013). Ancient History of the Manchuria. p. 115. ISBN 9781483667676.
- ^ Luo, Xianglin (1996). 唐代文化史研究. p. 45. ISBN 9789570512540.
- ^ Adamek, Piotr (2017). A Good Son is Sad if He Hears the Name of His Father: The Tabooing of Names in China as a Way of Implementing Social Values. p. 348. ISBN 9781351565219.
- ^ Su, Muzi (2006). 那些顛覆時代的女人.
- ^ Standen, Naomi (2007). Unbounded Loyalty: Frontier Crossings in Liao China. p. 1. ISBN 9780824829834.
- ^ Schaeffer, Kurtis; Kapstein, Matthew; Tuttle, Gray (2013). Sources of Tibetan Tradition. p. 338. ISBN 9780231509787.
- ^ a b Xu, Tiesheng (2017). 《百家姓》新解. ISBN 9787101125337.
- ^ Zang, Fengyu (2012). 中國歷史人物的讀心術. p. 154. ISBN 9789868825895.
- ^ Liang, De; Yang, Yang (1998). 皇权兴衰通鉴. p. 652.
- ^ Liu, Lydia; Karl, Rebecca; Ko, Dorothy (2013). The Birth of Chinese Feminism: Essential Texts in Transnational Theory. p. 164. ISBN 9780231533263.
- ^ a b c Kuhn, Dieter (2011). The Age of Confucian Rule: The Song Transformation of China. ISBN 9780674244344.
- ^ Lorge, Peter (2015). The Reunification of China: Peace through War under the Song Dynasty. p. 45. ISBN 9781107084759.
- ^ Winchester, Simon (2008). Bomb, Book and Compass: Joseph Needham and the Great Secrets of China. ISBN 9780141889894.
- ^ Bai, Zhide (2017). 大动乱：中古时代：五代辽宋夏金. ISBN 9787505141254.
- ^ Lee, Lily; Wiles, Sue (2014). Biographical Dictionary of Chinese Women: Tang Through Ming, 618-1644. p. xxi. ISBN 9780765643162.
- ^ Liu, Daochun (1989). Evaluations of Sung Dynasty Painters of Renown. p. 34. ISBN 9789004089662.
- ^ a b c d e f Gong, Xianzong (2014). 臺灣文學與中國童謠. p. 172. ISBN 9789577398598.
- ^ Zhang, Huicheng (2018). 天变：中国历代宫廷政变全景. ISBN 9787801757135.
- ^ Gao, Lujia (2015). 高姓简史. ISBN 9787210077862.
- ^ Tan, Zuowen; Wan, Xi (2006). 李煜. p. 7. ISBN 9787508510231.
- ^ Wu, Jiang; Chia, Lucille (2015). Spreading Buddha's Word in East Asia: The Formation and Transformation of the Chinese Buddhist Canon. p. 175. ISBN 9780231540193.
- ^ Chen, Huaxin (1990). 中國歷代帝王大觀. p. 379. ISBN 9787218003474.
- ^ Feng, Xianzhi (2006). 中国历代重大战争详解：隋唐战争史. ISBN 9787999031499.
- ^ Thurgood, Graham; LaPolla, Randy (2003). The Sino-Tibetan Languages. p. 7. ISBN 9780700711291.
- ^ Leidy, Denise (2008). The Art of Buddhism: An Introduction to Its History & Meaning. p. 189. ISBN 9781590306703.
- ^ Hsu (2012). p. 272.
- ^ Stone, Zofia (2017). Genghis Khan: A Biography. ISBN 9789386367112.
- ^ Szonyi, Michael (2017). A Companion to Chinese History. p. 130. ISBN 9781118624609.
- ^ Lee, Joo-Yup (2015). Qazaqlïq, or Ambitious Brigandage, and the Formation of the Qazaqs: State and Identity in Post-Mongol Central Eurasia. p. 59. ISBN 9789004306493.
- ^ Huang, Chunyi (2016). 北宋的外戚與政治. p. 3. ISBN 9789577399953.
- ^ McMahon, Keith (2016). Celestial Women: Imperial Wives and Concubines in China from Song to Qing. p. 24. ISBN 9781442255029.
- ^ Danver, Steven (2015). Native Peoples of the World: An Encyclopedia of Groups, Cultures and Contemporary Issues. p. 244. ISBN 9781317464006.
- ^ Tuttle, Gray; Schaeffer, Kurtis (2013). The Tibetan History Reader. p. 562. ISBN 9780231513548.
- ^ Kessler, Adam (2012). Song Blue and White Porcelain on the Silk Road. p. 77. ISBN 978-9004218598.
- ^ Simon, Karla (2013). Civil Society in China: The Legal Framework from Ancient Times to the "New Reform Era". p. 40. ISBN 9780190297640.
- ^ West, Stephen; Idema, Wilt (2014). The Orphan of Zhao and Other Yuan Plays: The Earliest Known Versions. p. ix. ISBN 9780231538107.
- ^ Huang, Ruyi (2017). 帝国的慢性病：冰火大明. ISBN 9787540780319.
- ^ Xing, Chunru; Li, Munan; Jie, Baofeng; Liu, Xinlian (2007). 古代民族史（下）.
- ^ Baumer, Christoph (2016). The History of Central Asia: The Age of Islam and the Mongols. ISBN 9781838609399.
- ^ Liu, Xingchu (2009). 甘肃文史精萃2：学术卷. ISBN 9787999033424.
- ^ Xie, Xuanjun (2017). 少数民族入主中国史略. p. 223. ISBN 9781387255351.
- ^ May, Timothy (2016). The Mongol Empire: A Historical Encyclopedia. pp. 26–28. ISBN 9781610693400.
- ^ Chen, Anfeng (2014). 甲申詩史：吳梅村書寫的一六四四. p. 2. ISBN 9789888310111.
- ^ Zhong, Guochang (2019). 天崩地裂時代下的皇族. p. 3. ISBN 9789620773419.
- ^ Jenco, Leigh; Idris, Murad; Thomas, Megan (2019). The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Political Theory. p. 96. ISBN 9780190086244.
- ^ Elliott, Mark (2001). The Manchu Way: The Eight Banners and Ethnic Identity in Late Imperial China. p. 71. ISBN 9780804746847.
- ^ Crossley, Pamela (2002). A Translucent Mirror: History and Identity in Qing Imperial Ideology. p. 193. ISBN 9780520234246.
- ^ Lee, Ji-young (2016). China's Hegemony: Four Hundred Years of East Asian Domination. p. 236. ISBN 9780231542173.
- ^ Forêt, Philippe (2000). Mapping Chengde: The Qing Landscape Enterprise. p. 13. ISBN 9780824822934.
- ^ a b Hao, Shiyuan (2019). China's Solution to Its Ethno-national Issues. p. 51. ISBN 9789813295193.
- ^ Wang, Hongying (2016). 中国式民主的类型学意义——一种宪法学视角的阐释. ISBN 9787516181829.
- ^ Wang, Fei-ling (2017). The China Order: Centralia, World Empire, and the Nature of Chinese Power. p. 68. ISBN 9781438467504.
- ^ Gao, James (2009). Historical Dictionary of Modern China (1800–1949). p. xxxvi. ISBN 9780810863088.
- ^ Yang, Yi (2018). 一本書讀懂亞洲史. p. 145. ISBN 9789863921165.
- ^ Wang, Zhenmin (2018). Relationship Between the Chinese Central Authorities and Regional Governments of Hong Kong and Macao: A Legal Perspective. p. 35. ISBN 9789811323225.
- ^ a b c d China: Five Thousand Years of History and Civilization. 2007. p. 107. ISBN 9789629371401.
- ^ a b c d e Zhang, Qizhi; Wang, Tianyou; Cheng, Chongde (2002). 元明清史. p. 381. ISBN 9789571128696.
- ^ a b c d Gan (2019). p. 26.
- ^ Talmon, Stefan; Jia, Bing Bing (2014). The South China Sea Arbitration: A Chinese Perspective. p. 186. ISBN 9781782253754.
- ^ a b Roy, Kaushik (2014). Military Transition in Early Modern Asia, 1400–1750: Cavalry, Guns, Government and Ships. pp. 86–87. ISBN 9781780938004.
- ^ a b Lin, Fu (2006). 中国历史地理学研究. pp. 142–143. ISBN 9787211050840.
- ^ a b Wu, Chuanjun; Yang, Qinye; Lu, Qi (2002). 20世纪中国学术大典：地理学. p. 297. ISBN 9787533430221.
- ^ Ge, Jianxiong; Hua, Linfu (2002). "The Development of Chinese Historical Geography over the Last 50 Years (1950–2000)" (PDF). Newsletter for Research in Chinese Studies. 21 (4): 20. Retrieved 24 November 2019.
- ^ Vu, Hong Lien; Sharrock, Peter (2014). Descending Dragon, Rising Tiger: A History of Vietnam. ISBN 9781780233888.
- ^ Walker, Hugh (2012). East Asia: A New History. p. 134. ISBN 9781477265178.
- ^ Chansiri, Disaphol (2008). The Chinese Émigrés of Thailand in the Twentieth Century. pp. 46–47. ISBN 9781934043745.
- ^ Zheng, Yangwen (2011). China on the Sea: How the Maritime World Shaped Modern China. p. 112. ISBN 9789004194786.
- ^ Rutherford, Scott (2002). Vietnam. p. 20. ISBN 9789812349842.
- ^ Minahan, James (2014). Ethnic Groups of North, East, and Central Asia: An Encyclopedia. p. 231. ISBN 9781610690188.
- ^ Elman, Benjamin; Liu, Jenny (2017). The 'Global' and the 'Local' in Early Modern and Modern East Asia. p. 175. ISBN 9789004338128.
- ^ Chan, Robert (2017). Korea-China Relations in History and Contemporary Implications. p. 10. ISBN 9783319622651.
- ^ Xie, Xuanjun (2016). 第三中国论. p. 202. ISBN 9781329800250.
- ^ Wu, Weiming (2017). 東亞易學史論：《周易》在日韓越琉的傳播與影響. p. 161. ISBN 9789863502500.
- ^ Linduff, Katheryn; Rubinson, Karen (2008). Are All Warriors Male?: Gender Roles on the Ancient Eurasian Steppe. p. 126. ISBN 9781461647508.
- ^ Chan, Yuk Wah (2013). Vietnamese-Chinese Relationships at the Borderlands: Trade, Tourism and Cultural Politics. p. 28. ISBN 9781134494576.
- China Handbook Editorial Committee, China Handbook Series: History (trans., Dun J. Li), Beijing, 1982, 188–189; and Shao Chang Lee, "China Cultural Development" (wall chart), East Lansing, 1984.