Part of a series of articles about |

General relativity |
---|

Part of a series on |

Physical cosmology |
---|

Special relativity |
---|

In physics and general relativity, **gravitational redshift** (known as **Einstein shift** in older literature^{[1]}^{[2]}) is that phenomenon in which electromagnetic waves or photons travelling out of a gravitational well (seem to) lose energy. This loss of energy corresponds to a decrease in the wave frequency and increase in the wavelength, known as a redshift. The opposite effect, whereby photons (seem to) gain energy when travelling into a gravitational well, is known as a **gravitational blueshift**. The effect was first described by Einstein in 1907,^{[3]} eight years before his publication of the full theory of relativity.

Gravitational redshift can be interpreted as a consequence of the equivalence principle (that gravity and acceleration are equivalent and the redshift is caused by the Doppler effect)^{[4]} or as a consequence of the mass-energy equivalence ('falling' photons gain energy),^{[5]} though there are numerous subtleties that complicate a rigorous derivation.^{[4]}^{[6]} A gravitational redshift can also equivalently be interpreted as gravitational time dilation at the source of the radiation:^{[6]}^{[2]} if two oscillators (producing electromagnetic radiation) are operating at different gravitational potentials, the oscillator at the higher gravitational potential (farther from the attracting body) will seem to ‘tick’ faster; that is, when observed from the same location, it will have a higher measured frequency than the oscillator at the lower gravitational potential (closer to the attracting body).

To first approximation, gravitational redshift is proportional to the difference in gravitational potential divided by the speed of light squared, thus resulting in a very small effect. Light escaping from the surface of the sun was predicted by Einstein in 1911 to be redshifted by roughly 2 ppm or 2 × 10^{−6}.^{[7]} Navigational signals from GPS satellites orbiting at 20,000 km altitude are perceived blueshifted by approximately 0.5 ppb or 5 × 10^{−10},^{[8]} corresponding to an increase of less than 1 Hz in the frequency of a 1.5 GHz signal. Accounting for the accompanying gravitational time dilation affecting the atomic clock in the satellite is however crucially important for accurate navigation.

In astronomy, the magnitude of a gravitational redshift is often expressed as the velocity that would create an equivalent shift through the relativistic Doppler effect. In such units, the 2 ppm sunlight redshift corresponds to a 633 m/s receding velocity, roughly of the same magnitude as convective motions in the sun, thus complicating the measurement.^{[7]} The GPS satellite gravitational blueshift velocity equivalent is less than 0,2 m/s, which is negligible compared to the actual Doppler shift resulting from its orbital velocity. In astronomical objects with strong gravitational fields the redshift can be much greater; for example, light from the surface of a white dwarf is gravitationally redshifted on average by around 50 km/s/c.^{[9]}

Observing the gravitational redshift in the solar system is one of the classical tests of general relativity. Measuring the gravitational redshift to high precision with atomic clocks can serve as a test of Lorentz symmetry and guide searches for dark matter.

Einstein's theory of general relativity incorporates the equivalence principle, which can be stated in various different ways. One such statement is that gravitational effects are locally undetectable for a free-falling observer. Therefore, in a laboratory experiment at the surface of the earth, all gravitational effects should be equivalent to the effects that would have been observed if the laboratory had been accelerating through outer space at *g*. One consequence is a gravitational Doppler effect. If a light pulse is emitted at the floor of the laboratory, then a free-falling observer says that by the time it reaches the ceiling, the ceiling has accelerated away from it, and therefore when observed by a detector fixed to the ceiling, it will be observed to have been Doppler shifted toward the red end of the spectrum. This shift, which the free-falling observer considers to be a kinematical Doppler shift, is thought of by the laboratory observer as a gravitational redshift. Such an effect was verified in the 1959 Pound–Rebka experiment. In a case such as this, where the gravitational field is uniform, the change in wavelength is given by

where is the change in height. Since this prediction arises directly from the equivalence principle, it does not require any of the mathematical apparatus of general relativity, and its verification does not specifically support general relativity over any other theory that incorporates the equivalence principle.

On Earth's surface (or in a spaceship accelerating at 1g), the gravitational redshift is approximately 1.1 × 10^{−16}, the equivalent of a 3.3 × 10^{−8} m/s Doppler shift, for every meter of height differential.

When the field is not uniform, the simplest and most useful case to consider is that of a spherically symmetric field. By Birkhoff's theorem, such a field is described in general relativity by the Schwarzschild metric, , where is the clock time of an observer at distance *R* from the center, is the time measured by an observer at infinity, is the Schwarzschild radius , "..." represents terms that vanish if the observer is at rest, is Newton's gravitational constant, the mass of the gravitating body, and the speed of light. The result is that frequencies and wavelengths are shifted according to the ratio

where

- is the wavelength of the light as measured by the observer at infinity,
- is the wavelength measured at the source of emission, and
- is the radius at which the photon is emitted.

This can be related to the redshift parameter conventionally defined as .

In the case where neither the emitter nor the observer is at infinity, the transitivity of Doppler shifts allows us to generalize the result to . The redshift formula for the frequency is . When is small, these results are consistent with the equation given above based on the equivalence principle.

The redshift ratio may also be expressed in terms of a (Newtonian) escape velocity at , resulting in the corresponding Lorentz factor:

- .

For an object compact enough to have an event horizon, the redshift is not defined for photons emitted inside the Schwarzschild radius, both because signals cannot escape from inside the horizon and because an object such as the emitter cannot be stationary inside the horizon, as was assumed above. Therefore, this formula only applies when is larger than . When the photon is emitted at a distance equal to the Schwarzschild radius, the redshift will be *infinitely* large, and it will not escape to *any* finite distance from the Schwarzschild sphere. When the photon is emitted at an infinitely large distance, there is no redshift.

In the Newtonian limit, i.e. when is sufficiently large compared to the Schwarzschild radius , the redshift can be approximated as

where is the gravitational acceleration at . For Earth's surface with respect to infinity, *z* is approximately 7 × 10^{−10} (the equivalent of a 0.2 m/s radial Doppler shift); for the Moon it is approximately 3 × 10^{−11} (about 1 cm/s). The value for the surface of the sun is about 2 × 10^{−6}, corresponding to 0.64 km/s. (For non-relativisitc velocities, the radial Doppler equivalent velocity can be approximated by multiplying *z* with the speed of light.)

The z-value can be expressed succinctly in terms of the escape velocity at , since the gravitational potential is equal to half the square of the escape velocity, thus:

where is the escape velocity at .

It can also be related to the circular orbit velocity at , which equals , thus

- .

For example, the gravitational blueshift of distant starlight due to the sun's gravity, which the Earth is orbiting at about 30 km/s, would be approximately 1 × 10^{−8} or the equivalent of a 3 m/s radial Doppler shift. However, the Earth is in free-fall around the sun, and is thus an inertial observer, so the effect is not visible.^{[citation needed]}

For an object in a (circular) orbit, the gravitational redshift is of comparable magnitude as the transverse Doppler effect, where *β*=*v*/*c*, while both are much smaller than the radial Doppler effect, for which .

A number of experimenters initially claimed to have identified the effect using astronomical measurements, and the effect was considered to have been finally identified in the spectral lines of the star Sirius B by W.S. Adams in 1925.^{[10]} However, measurements by Adams have been criticized as being too low^{[10]}^{[11]} and these observations are now considered to be measurements of spectra that are unusable because of scattered light from the primary, Sirius A.^{[11]} The first accurate measurement of the gravitational redshift of a white dwarf was done by Popper in 1954, measuring a 21 km/s gravitational redshift of 40 Eridani B.^{[11]} The redshift of Sirius B was finally measured by Greenstein *et al.* in 1971, obtaining the value for the gravitational redshift of 89±19 km/s, with more accurate measurements by the Hubble Space Telescope, showing 80.4±4.8 km/s.^{[citation needed]}

James W. Brault, a graduate student of Robert Dicke at Princeton University, measured the gravitational redshift of the sun using optical methods in 1962.^{[citation needed]} In 2020, a team of scientists published the most accurate measurement of the solar gravitational redshift so far, made by analyzing Fe spectral lines in sunlight reflected by the moon; their measurement of a mean global 638 ± 6 m/s lineshift is in agreement with the theoretical value of 633.1 m/s.^{[12]}^{[13]} Measuring the solar redshift is complicated by the Doppler shift caused by the motion of the sun's surface, which is of similar magnitude as the gravitational effect.^{[13]}

In 2011 the group of Radek Wojtak of the Niels Bohr Institute at the University of Copenhagen collected data from 8000 galaxy clusters and found that the light coming from the cluster centers tended to be red-shifted compared to the cluster edges, confirming the energy loss due to gravity.^{[14]}

In 2018, the star S2 made its closest approach to Sgr A*, the 4-million solar mass supermassive black hole at the centre of the Milky Way, reaching 7650 km/s or about 2,5% of the speed of light while passing the black hole at a distance of just 120 AU, or 1400 Schwarzschild radii. Independent analyses by the GRAVITY collaboration^{[15]}^{[16]}^{[17]}^{[18]} (led by Reinhard Genzel) and the KECK/UCLA Galactic Center Group^{[19]}^{[20]} (led by Andrea Ghez) revealed a combined transverse Doppler and gravitational redshift up to 200 km/s/c, in agreement with general relativity predictions.

The effect is now considered to have been definitively verified by the experiments of Pound, Rebka and Snider between 1959 and 1965. The Pound–Rebka experiment of 1959 measured the gravitational redshift in spectral lines using a terrestrial ^{57}Fe gamma source over a vertical height of 22.5 metres.^{[21]} This paper was the first determination of the gravitational redshift which used measurements of the change in wavelength of gamma-ray photons generated with the Mössbauer effect, which generates radiation with a very narrow line width. The accuracy of the gamma-ray measurements was typically 1%.

An improved experiment was done by Pound and Snider in 1965, with an accuracy better than the 1% level.^{[22]}

A very accurate gravitational redshift experiment was performed in 1976,^{[23]} where a hydrogen maser clock on a rocket was launched to a height of 10,000 km, and its rate compared with an identical clock on the ground. It tested the gravitational redshift to 0.007%.

Later tests can be done with the Global Positioning System (GPS), which must account for the gravitational redshift in its timing system, and physicists have analyzed timing data from the GPS to confirm other tests. When the first satellite was launched, it showed the predicted shift of 38 microseconds per day. This rate of the discrepancy is sufficient to substantially impair the function of GPS within hours if not accounted for. An excellent account of the role played by general relativity in the design of GPS can be found in Ashby 2003.^{[24]}

In 2020 a group at the University of Tokyo measured the gravitational redshift of two strontium-87 optical lattice clocks.^{[25]} The measurement took place at Tokyo Tower where the clocks were separated by approximately 450 m and connected by telecom fibers. The gravitational redshift can be expressed as

- ,

where is the gravitational redshift, is the optical clock transition frequency, is the difference in gravitational potential, and denotes the violation from general relativity. By Ramsey spectroscopy of the strontium-87 optical clock transition (429 THz, 698 nm) the group determined the gravitational redshift between the two optical clocks to be 21.18 Hz, corresponding to a *z*-value of approximately 5 × 10^{−14}. Their measured value of , , is an agreement with recent measurements made with hydrogen masers in elliptical orbits.^{[26]}^{[27]}

The gravitational weakening of light from high-gravity stars was predicted by John Michell in 1783 and Pierre-Simon Laplace in 1796, using Isaac Newton's concept of light corpuscles (see: emission theory) and who predicted that some stars would have a gravity so strong that light would not be able to escape. The effect of gravity on light was then explored by Johann Georg von Soldner (1801), who calculated the amount of deflection of a light ray by the sun, arriving at the Newtonian answer which is half the value predicted by general relativity. All of this early work assumed that light could slow down and fall, which is inconsistent with the modern understanding of light waves.

Once it became accepted that light was an electromagnetic wave, it was clear that the frequency of light should not change from place to place, since waves from a source with a fixed frequency keep the same frequency everywhere. One way around this conclusion would be if time itself were altered—if clocks at different points had different rates.

This was precisely Einstein's conclusion in 1911. He considered an accelerating box, and noted that according to the special theory of relativity, the clock rate at the "bottom" of the box (the side away from the direction of acceleration) was slower than the clock rate at the "top" (the side toward the direction of acceleration). Nowadays, this can be easily shown in accelerated coordinates. The metric tensor in units where the speed of light is one is:

and for an observer at a constant value of r, the rate at which a clock ticks, R(r), is the square root of the time coefficient, R(r)=r. The acceleration at position r is equal to the curvature of the hyperbola at fixed r, and like the curvature of the nested circles in polar coordinates, it is equal to 1/r.

So at a fixed value of g, the fractional rate of change of the clock-rate, the percentage change in the ticking at the top of an accelerating box vs at the bottom, is:

The rate is faster at larger values of R, away from the apparent direction of acceleration. The rate is zero at r=0, which is the location of the acceleration horizon.

Using the equivalence principle, Einstein concluded that the same thing holds in any gravitational field, that the rate of clocks R at different heights was altered according to the gravitational field g. When g is slowly varying, it gives the fractional rate of change of the ticking rate. If the ticking rate is everywhere almost this same, the fractional rate of change is the same as the absolute rate of change, so that:

Since the rate of clocks and the gravitational potential have the same derivative, they are the same up to a constant. The constant is chosen to make the clock rate at infinity equal to 1. Since the gravitational potential is zero at infinity:

where the speed of light has been restored to make the gravitational potential dimensionless.

The coefficient of the in the metric tensor is the square of the clock rate, which for small values of the potential is given by keeping only the linear term:

and the full metric tensor is:

where again the C's have been restored. This expression is correct in the full theory of general relativity, to lowest order in the gravitational field, and ignoring the variation of the space-space and space-time components of the metric tensor, which only affect fast moving objects.

Using this approximation, Einstein reproduced the incorrect Newtonian value for the deflection of light in 1909. But since a light beam is a fast moving object, the space-space components contribute too. After constructing the full theory of general relativity in 1916, Einstein solved for the space-space components in a post-Newtonian approximation and calculated the correct amount of light deflection – double the Newtonian value. Einstein's prediction was confirmed by many experiments, starting with Arthur Eddington's 1919 solar eclipse expedition.

The changing rates of clocks allowed Einstein to conclude that light waves change frequency as they move, and the frequency/energy relationship for photons allowed him to see that this was best interpreted as the effect of the gravitational field on the mass–energy of the photon. To calculate the changes in frequency in a nearly static gravitational field, only the time component of the metric tensor is important, and the lowest order approximation is accurate enough for ordinary stars and planets, which are much bigger than their Schwarzschild radius.

- Tests of general relativity
- Equivalence principle
- Gravitational time dilation
- Redshift
- Gravitational wave#Redshifting (Redshifting of Gravitational waves due to speed or cosmic expansion)

**^**.mw-parser-output cite.citation{font-style:inherit}.mw-parser-output .citation q{quotes:"\"""\"""'""'"}.mw-parser-output .id-lock-free a,.mw-parser-output .citation .cs1-lock-free a{background:linear-gradient(transparent,transparent),url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/65/Lock-green.svg")right 0.1em center/9px no-repeat}.mw-parser-output .id-lock-limited a,.mw-parser-output .id-lock-registration a,.mw-parser-output .citation .cs1-lock-limited a,.mw-parser-output .citation .cs1-lock-registration a{background:linear-gradient(transparent,transparent),url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d6/Lock-gray-alt-2.svg")right 0.1em center/9px no-repeat}.mw-parser-output .id-lock-subscription a,.mw-parser-output .citation .cs1-lock-subscription a{background:linear-gradient(transparent,transparent),url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/aa/Lock-red-alt-2.svg")right 0.1em center/9px no-repeat}.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registration{color:#555}.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription span,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registration span{border-bottom:1px dotted;cursor:help}.mw-parser-output .cs1-ws-icon a{background:linear-gradient(transparent,transparent),url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4c/Wikisource-logo.svg")right 0.1em center/12px no-repeat}.mw-parser-output code.cs1-code{color:inherit;background:inherit;border:none;padding:inherit}.mw-parser-output .cs1-hidden-error{display:none;font-size:100%}.mw-parser-output .cs1-visible-error{font-size:100%}.mw-parser-output .cs1-maint{display:none;color:#33aa33;margin-left:0.3em}.mw-parser-output .cs1-format{font-size:95%}.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-left,.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-wl-left{padding-left:0.2em}.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-right,.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-wl-right{padding-right:0.2em}.mw-parser-output .citation .mw-selflink{font-weight:inherit} "Einstein shift definition and meaning | Collins English Dictionary".*www.collinsdictionary.com*. Retrieved 2021-01-21.- ^
^{a}^{b}Eddington, A. S. (1926). "Einstein Shift and Doppler Shift". *Nature*.**117**(2933): 86. Bibcode:1926Natur.117...86E. doi:10.1038/117086a0. ISSN 1476-4687. S2CID 4092843. **^**Valente, Mário Bacelar (2018-12-06). "Einstein's redshift derivations: its history from 1907 to 1921". *Circumscribere: International Journal for the History of Science*.**22**: 1–16. doi:10.23925/1980-7651.2018v22;1-16. ISSN 1980-7651.- ^
^{a}^{b}Florides, Petros S. "Einstein's Equivalence Principle and the Gravitational Red Shift" (PDF). *School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Ireland*. **^**Evans, R. F.; Dunning-Davies, J. (2004). "The Gravitational Red-Shift". arXiv:gr-qc/0403082. - ^
^{a}^{b}Scott, Robert B (2015). "Teaching the gravitational redshift: lessons from the history and philosophy of physics". *J. Phys.: Conf*.**600**(1): 012055. Bibcode:2015JPhCS.600a2055S. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/600/1/012055 – via IOP Publishing. - ^
^{a}^{b}Gräfe, Franziska (23 October 2020). "New study verifies prediction from Einstein's General Theory of Relativity — English". *Leibniz Institute for Astrophysics Potsdam*. Retrieved 2021-01-14. **^**Ashby, Neil (July 20–21, 2006). "Relativity in the Global Positioning System". *American Association of Physics Teachers*. Retrieved 2021-01-14.**^**Trimble, Virginia; Barstow, Martin (November 2020). "Gravitational redshift and White Dwarf stars". *Einstein-Online*. Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics. Retrieved 2021-01-16.- ^
^{a}^{b}Hetherington, N. S., "Sirius B and the gravitational redshift - an historical review",*Quarterly Journal Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 21,*Sept. 1980, p. 246-252. Accessed 6 April 2017. - ^
^{a}^{b}^{c}Holberg, J. B., "Sirius B and the Measurement of the Gravitational Redshift",*Journal for the History of Astronomy, Vol. 41,*1, 2010, p. 41-64. Accessed 6 April 2017. **^**Hernández, J. I. González; Rebolo, R.; Pasquini, L.; Curto, G. Lo; Molaro, P.; Caffau, E.; Ludwig, H.-G.; Steffen, M.; Esposito, M.; Mascareño, A. Suárez; Toledo-Padrón, B. (2020-11-01). "The solar gravitational redshift from HARPS-LFC Moon spectra - A test of the general theory of relativity". *Astronomy & Astrophysics*.**643**: A146. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038937. ISSN 0004-6361. S2CID 221836649.- ^
^{a}^{b}Smith, Keith T. (2020-12-18). "Gravitational redshift of the Sun". *Science*.**370**(6523): 1429–1430. Bibcode:2020Sci...370Q1429S. doi:10.1126/science.370.6523.1429-e (inactive 2021-02-15). ISSN 0036-8075.CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of February 2021 (link) **^**Bhattacharjee, Yudhijit (2011). "Galaxy Clusters Validate Einstein's Theory". News.sciencemag.org. Retrieved 2013-07-23. **^**Abuter, R.; Amorim, A.; Anugu, N.; Bauböck, M.; Benisty, M.; Berger, J. P.; Blind, N.; Bonnet, H.; Brandner, W.; Buron, A.; Collin, C. (2018-07-01). "Detection of the gravitational redshift in the orbit of the star S2 near the Galactic centre massive black hole". *Astronomy & Astrophysics*.**615**: L15. arXiv:1807.09409. Bibcode:2018A&A...615L..15G. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833718. ISSN 0004-6361. S2CID 118891445.**^**Witze, Alexandra (2018-07-26). "Milky Way's black hole provides long-sought test of Einstein's general relativity". *Nature*.**560**(7716): 17. Bibcode:2018Natur.560...17W. doi:10.1038/d41586-018-05825-3. PMID 30065325. S2CID 51888156.**^**"Tests of General Relativity". *www.mpe.mpg.de*. Retrieved 2021-01-17.**^**information@eso.org. "First Successful Test of Einstein's General Relativity Near Supermassive Black Hole - Culmination of 26 years of ESO observations of the heart of the Milky Way". *www.eso.org*. Retrieved 2021-01-17.**^**Do, Tuan; Hees, Aurelien; Ghez, Andrea; Martinez, Gregory D.; Chu, Devin S.; Jia, Siyao; Sakai, Shoko; Lu, Jessica R.; Gautam, Abhimat K.; O’Neil, Kelly Kosmo; Becklin, Eric E. (2019-08-16). "Relativistic redshift of the star S0-2 orbiting the Galactic center supermassive black hole". *Science*.**365**(6454): 664–668. arXiv:1907.10731. Bibcode:2019Sci...365..664D. doi:10.1126/science.aav8137. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 31346138. S2CID 198901506.**^**Siegel, Ethan (2019-08-01). "General Relativity Rules: Einstein Victorious In Unprecedented Gravitational Redshift Test". *Medium*. Retrieved 2021-01-17.**^**Pound, R.; Rebka, G. (1960). "Apparent Weight of Photons". *Physical Review Letters*.**4**(7): 337–341. Bibcode:1960PhRvL...4..337P. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.4.337.**^**Pound, R. V.; Snider J. L. (November 2, 1964). "Effect of Gravity on Nuclear Resonance". *Physical Review Letters*.**13**(18): 539–540. Bibcode:1964PhRvL..13..539P. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.539.**^**Vessot, R. F. C.; M. W. Levine; E. M. Mattison; E. L. Blomberg; T. E. Hoffman; G. U. Nystrom; B. F. Farrel; R. Decher; et al. (December 29, 1980). "Test of Relativistic Gravitation with a Space-Borne Hydrogen Maser". *Physical Review Letters*.**45**(26): 2081–2084. Bibcode:1980PhRvL..45.2081V. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.45.2081.**^**Ashby, Neil (2003). "Relativity in the Global Positioning System". *Living Reviews in Relativity*.**6**(1): 1. Bibcode:2003LRR.....6....1A. doi:10.12942/lrr-2003-1. PMC 5253894. PMID 28163638.**^**Takamoto, M.; Ushijima, I.; Ohmae, N.; et al. (6 April 2020). "Test of general relativity by a pair of transportable optical lattice clocks". *Nat. Photonics*.**14**(7): 411–415. Bibcode:2020NaPho..14..411T. doi:10.1038/s41566-020-0619-8. S2CID 216309660.**^**Sven Herrmann; Felix Finke; Martin Lülf; Olga Kichakova; Dirk Puetzfeld; Daniela Knickmann; Meike List; Benny Rievers; Gabriele Giorgi; Christoph Günther; Hansjörg Dittus; Roberto Prieto-Cerdeira; Florian Dilssner; Francisco Gonzalez; Erik Schönemann; Javier Ventura-Traveset; Claus Lämmerzahl (December 2018). "Test of the Gravitational Redshift with Galileo Satellites in an Eccentric Orbit". *Physical Review Letters*.**121**(23): 231102. arXiv:1812.09161. Bibcode:2018PhRvL.121w1102H. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.231102. PMID 30576165. S2CID 58537350.**^**P. Delva; N. Puchades; E. Schönemann; F. Dilssner; C. Courde; S. Bertone; F. Gonzalez; A. Hees; Ch. Le Poncin-Lafitte; F. Meynadier; R. Prieto-Cerdeira; B. Sohet; J. Ventura-Traveset; P. Wolf (December 2018). "Gravitational Redshift Test Using Eccentric Galileo Satellites". *Physical Review Letters*.**121**(23): 231101. arXiv:1812.03711. Bibcode:2018PhRvL.121w1101D. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.231101. PMID 30576203. S2CID 58666075.

Michell, John (1784). "On the means of discovering the distance, magnitude etc. of the fixed stars". *Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society*.**74**: 35–57. Bibcode:1784RSPT...74...35M. doi:10.1098/rstl.1784.0008.

Laplace, Pierre-Simon (1796). *The system of the world (English translation 1809)*.**2**. London: Richard Phillips. pp. 366–368.

Soldner, Johann Georg von (1804). . *Berliner Astronomisches Jahrbuch*: 161–172.

- Albert Einstein, "Relativity: the Special and General Theory." (@Project Gutenberg).
Pound, R.V.; Rebka, G.A.; Jr (1959). "Gravitational Red-Shift in Nuclear Resonance". *Phys. Rev. Lett*.**3**(9): 439–441. Bibcode:1959PhRvL...3..439P. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.3.439.Pound, R.V.; Snider, J.L. (1965). "Effect of gravity on gamma radiation". *Phys. Rev. B*.**140**(3B): 788–803. Bibcode:1965PhRv..140..788P. doi:10.1103/physrev.140.b788.Pound, R.V. (2000). "Weighing Photons" (2000)". *Classical and Quantum Gravity*.**17**(12): 2303–2311. Bibcode:2000CQGra..17.2303P. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/17/12/301.

Misner, Charles W.; Thorne, Kip S.; Wheeler, John Archibald (1973-09-15). *Gravitation*. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman. ISBN 978-0-7167-0344-0.