Part of a series on |

War |
---|

**Lanchester's laws** are mathematical formulae for calculating the relative strengths of military forces. The Lanchester equations are differential equations describing the time dependence of two armies' strengths A and B as a function of time, with the function depending only on A and B.^{[1]}^{[2]}

In 1915 and 1916, during World War I, M. Osipov and Frederick Lanchester independently devised a series of differential equations to demonstrate the power relationships between opposing forces. Among these are what is known as *Lanchester's Linear Law* (for ancient combat) and *Lanchester's Square Law* (for modern combat with long-range weapons such as firearms).

Zoologists have found chimpanzees intuitively follow *Lanchester's Square Law* before engaging another troop of chimpanzees. A group of chimpanzees will not attack another group unless the numerical advantage is at least a factor of 1.5.^{[3]}

For ancient combat, between phalanxes of soldiers with spears, say, one soldier could only ever fight exactly one other soldier at a time. If each soldier kills, and is killed by, exactly one other, then the number of soldiers remaining at the end of the battle is simply the difference between the larger army and the smaller, assuming identical weapons.

The linear law also applies to unaimed fire into an enemy-occupied area. The rate of attrition depends on the density of the available targets in the target area as well as the number of weapons shooting. If two forces, occupying the same land area and using the same weapons, shoot randomly into the same target area, they will both suffer the same rate and number of casualties, until the smaller force is eventually eliminated: the greater probability of any one shot hitting the larger force is balanced by the greater number of shots directed at the smaller force.

**Lanchester's square law** is also known as the **N-square law**.

With firearms engaging each other directly with aimed shooting from a distance, they can attack multiple targets and can receive fire from multiple directions. The rate of attrition now depends only on the number of weapons shooting. Lanchester determined that the power of such a force is proportional not to the number of units it has, but to the square of the number of units. This is known as Lanchester's square law.

More precisely, the law specifies the casualties a shooting force will inflict over a period of time, relative to those inflicted by the opposing force. In its basic form, the law is only useful to predict outcomes and casualties by attrition. It does not apply to whole armies, where tactical deployment means not all troops will be engaged all the time. It only works where each unit (soldier, ship, etc.) can kill only one equivalent unit at a time. For this reason, the law does not apply to machine guns, artillery, or nuclear weapons. The law requires an assumption that casualties accumulate over time: it does not work in situations in which opposing troops kill each other instantly, either by shooting simultaneously or by one side getting off the first shot and inflicting multiple casualties.

Note that Lanchester's square law does not apply to technological force, only numerical force; so it requires an N-squared-fold increase in quality to compensate for an N-fold decrease in quantity.

Suppose that two armies, Red and Blue are engaging each other in combat. Red is shooting a continuous stream of bullets at Blue. Meanwhile, Blue is shooting a continuous stream of bullets at Red.

Let symbol *A* represent the number of soldiers in the Red force. Each one has *offensive firepower α*, which is the number of enemy soldiers it can incapacitate (e.g., kill or injure) per unit time. Likewise, Blue has *B* soldiers, each with offensive firepower *β*.

Lanchester's square law calculates the number of soldiers lost on each side using the following pair of equations.^{[4]} Here, *dA/dt* represents the rate at which the number of Red soldiers is changing at a particular instant. A negative value indicates the loss of soldiers. Similarly, *dB/dt* represents the rate of change of the number of Blue soldiers.

The solution to these equations shows that:

- If
*α*=*β*, i.e. the two sides have equal firepower, the side with more soldiers at the beginning of the battle will win; - If
*A*=*B*, i.e. the two sides have equal numbers of soldiers, the side with greater firepower will win; - If
*A*>*B*and*α*>*β*, then Red will win, while if*A*<*B*and*α*<*β*, Blue will win; - If
*A*>*B*but*α*<*β*, or*A*<*B*but*α*>*β*, the winning side will depend on whether the ratio of*β*/*α*is greater or less than the square of the ratio of*A*/*B*. Thus, if numbers and firepower are unequal in opposite directions, a superiority in firepower equal to the square of the inferiority in numbers is required for victory; or, to put it another way, the effectiveness of the army rises as the square of the number of people in it, but only linearly with their fighting ability.

The first three of these conclusions are obvious. The final one is the origin of the name "square law"

Lanchester's equations are related to the more recent salvo combat model equations, with two main differences.

First, Lanchester's original equations form a continuous time model, whereas the basic salvo equations form a discrete time model. In a gun battle, bullets or shells are typically fired in large quantities. Each round has a relatively low chance of hitting its target, and does a relatively small amount of damage. Therefore, Lanchester's equations model gunfire as a stream of firepower that continuously weakens the enemy force over time.

By comparison, cruise missiles typically are fired in relatively small quantities. Each one has a high probability of hitting its target, and carries a relatively powerful warhead. Therefore, it makes more sense to model them as a discrete pulse (or salvo) of firepower in a discrete time model.

Second, Lanchester's equations include only offensive firepower, whereas the salvo equations also include defensive firepower. Given their small size and large number, it is not practical to intercept bullets and shells in a gun battle. By comparison, cruise missiles can be intercepted (shot down) by surface-to-air missiles and anti-aircraft guns. So it is important to include such active defenses in a missile combat model.

Lanchester's laws have been used to model historical battles for research purposes. Examples include Pickett's Charge of Confederate infantry against Union infantry during the 1863 Battle of Gettysburg,^{[5]} and the 1940 Battle of Britain between the British and German air forces.^{[6]}

In modern warfare, to take into account that to some extent both linear and the square apply often, an exponent of 1.5 is used.^{[7]}^{[8]}^{[9]}^{[10]}

Attempts have been made to apply Lanchester's laws to conflicts between animal groups.^{[11]} Examples include tests with chimpanzees ^{[3]} and fire ants.^{[12]} The chimpanzee application was relatively successful; the fire ant application did not confirm that the square law applied.

- Attrition warfare
- Maneuver warfare
- Lewis Fry Richardson
- Salvo combat model
- Lotka–Volterra equations similar mathematical model for predator-prey dynamics
- Petrie multiplier similar mathematical model for sexism

.mw-parser-output cite.citation{font-style:inherit}.mw-parser-output .citation q{quotes:"\"""\"""'""'"}.mw-parser-output .id-lock-free a,.mw-parser-output .citation .cs1-lock-free a{background:linear-gradient(transparent,transparent),url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/65/Lock-green.svg")right 0.1em center/9px no-repeat}.mw-parser-output .id-lock-limited a,.mw-parser-output .id-lock-registration a,.mw-parser-output .citation .cs1-lock-limited a,.mw-parser-output .citation .cs1-lock-registration a{background:linear-gradient(transparent,transparent),url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d6/Lock-gray-alt-2.svg")right 0.1em center/9px no-repeat}.mw-parser-output .id-lock-subscription a,.mw-parser-output .citation .cs1-lock-subscription a{background:linear-gradient(transparent,transparent),url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/aa/Lock-red-alt-2.svg")right 0.1em center/9px no-repeat}.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registration{color:#555}.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription span,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registration span{border-bottom:1px dotted;cursor:help}.mw-parser-output .cs1-ws-icon a{background:linear-gradient(transparent,transparent),url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4c/Wikisource-logo.svg")right 0.1em center/12px no-repeat}.mw-parser-output code.cs1-code{color:inherit;background:inherit;border:none;padding:inherit}.mw-parser-output .cs1-hidden-error{display:none;font-size:100%}.mw-parser-output .cs1-visible-error{font-size:100%}.mw-parser-output .cs1-maint{display:none;color:#33aa33;margin-left:0.3em}.mw-parser-output .cs1-format{font-size:95%}.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-left,.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-wl-left{padding-left:0.2em}.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-right,.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-wl-right{padding-right:0.2em}.mw-parser-output .citation .mw-selflink{font-weight:inherit} Dupuy, Col T N (1979).*Numbers, Predictions and War*. Macdonald and Jane's.Lanchester, Frederick W. (1916). *Aircraft in Warfare*.

**^**Lanchester F.W.,*Mathematics in Warfare*in*The World of Mathematics,*Vol. 4 (1956) Ed. Newman, J.R., Simon and Schuster, 2138–2157; anthologised from*Aircraft in Warfare*(1916)**^**"Lanchester Equations and Scoring Systems - RAND". - ^
^{a}^{b}Wilson, M. L., Britton, N. F., & Franks, N. R. (2002). Chimpanzees and the mathematics of battle. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 269, 1107-1112. doi:10.1098/rspb.2001.1926 **^**Taylor JG. 1983. Lanchester Models of Warfare, volumes I & II. Operations Research Society of America.**^**Armstrong MJ, Sodergren SE, 2015, Refighting Pickett's Charge: mathematical modeling of the Civil War battlefield, Social Science Quarterly.**^**MacKay N, Price C, 2011, Safety in Numbers: Ideas of concentration in Royal Air Force fighter defence from Lanchester to the Battle of Britain, History 96, 304–325.**^**Race to the Swift: Thoughts on Twenty-First Century Warfare by Richard E. Simpkin**^**"Lanchester's Laws and Attrition Modeling, Part II". 9 July 2010. **^**"Asymmetric Warfare: A Primer". **^**M. Osipov, "The Influence of the Numerical Strength of Engaged Forces on their Casualties," pages 7-5 to 7-8.**^**Clifton, E. (2020). A Brief Review on the Application of Lanchester's Models of Combat in Nonhuman Animals. Ecological Psychology, 32, 181-191. doi:10.1080/10407413.2020.1846456**^**Plowes, N. J. R., & Adams, E. S. (2005). An empirical test of Lanchester's square law: mortality during battles of the fire ant Solenopsis invicta. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 272, 1809-1814. doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3162